Hazlett v. Estate of Blakely
Decision Date | 16 December 1903 |
Docket Number | 13,165 |
Citation | 97 N.W. 808,70 Neb. 613 |
Parties | ALFRED HAZLETT, RECEIVER OF THE AMERICAN BANK OF BEATRICE, NEBRASKA, v. ESTATE OF WILLIAM BLAKELY, DECEASED, ET AL |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR to the district court for Gage county: CHARLES B. LETTON JUDGE. Reversed.
REVERSED.
G. M Johnson and Fulton Jack, for plaintiff in error.
N. K Griggs, Samuel Rinaker and Robert S. Bibb. contra.
ALBERT, C. BARNES and GLANVILLE, CC., concur.
On the 8th day of April, 1901, Alfred Hazlett, as receiver of the American Bank of Beatrice, Nebraska, whom we shall hereafter call the plaintiff, filed a petition in the county court of Gage county against Cornelia D. Blakely, administratrix of the estate of William Blakely, deceased, and his heirs at law, whom we shall hereafter call the defendants, which, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
Among the written objections interposed by the defendants to the granting of the prayer of the petition are the following:
Upon a hearing had in the county court, the relief asked by the plaintiff was denied and the proceedings dismissed. The plaintiff then prosecuted an appeal to the district court, where the cause was submitted on the same record. The parties stipulated that the facts stated in the petition, as well as those included in the objections filed, were true. The only evidence offered was an order of the district court showing the plaintiff's authority as receiver to institute proceedings of this character. The district court found in favor of the defendants, and gave judgment accordingly. The plaintiff brings the case here for review.
It will be observed that a portion of the relief sought by the plaintiff was the vacation of a decree of final settlement and an order discharging the administratrix. But we do not think such relief is essential to the ultimate relief sought, namely, the examination and allowance of the claim against the estate. The law appears to be that the formal discharge contained in the decree on final accounting applies only as to the accounts of the parties up to that period. The trust of an administrator or executor is a continuing one, and a decree of final accounting does not destroy the relation of such officer, but only discharges him from liability for the past. 2 Woerner, American Law of Administration (2d ed.), sec. 571. In Diversey v. Johnson, 93 Ill. 547, cited by the author above, the former decisions of that state on this point are reviewed. In referring to one of these decisions the court say:
"In Cutright v. Stanford, 81 Ill. 240, the claim was presented and allowed in the probate court after two years from the grant of administration, and after the administrator had distributed the residue in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Noce v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
... ... showing the discharge of plaintiff as executrix of the estate ... of Henry H. Noce, deceased, is not open to collateral attack ... and cannot be disproved by ... 73; Fraser v. Fraser, 149 Ill.App. 186; Weyer v ... Watt, Exr., 48 Ohio St. 545; Hazlett v. Estate of ... Blakely, 70 Neb. 613, 97 N.W. 808.] ... Appellant ... next ... ...
-
Hulburd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
... ... On October 27, 1926, he mailed a letter to the 'Estate of Charles H ... Page 303 ... Hulburd, c/o De Forest Hulburd, 86 East Randolph Street, ... See, also, Hazlett v. Estate of ... Page 311 ... Blakely, 70 Neb. 613, 617, 97 N.W. 808; Weyer v. Watt, 48 Ohio ... ...
-
Parker v. Luehrmann
...does not destroy the relationship of such officer but only discharges him from liability for the past.” Hazlett v. Estate of Blakely, 70 Neb. 613, 97 N. W. 808;Brownell v. Adams, 121 Neb. 304, 236 N. W. 750. 4. Sections 4 and 7, art. 12 of the Constitution, must be construed together. They ......
-
Parker v. Luehrmann
... ... estate mentioned in section ... 30-701, Comp. St. 1929, ... [252 N.W. 403] ... is one where the ... him from liability for the past." Hazlett v. Estate ... of Blakely, 70 Neb. 613, 97 N.W. 808; Brownell v ... Adams, 121 Neb. 304, 236 N.W ... ...