Headler v. Cloud

• Citation: 51 Mo. 301
• Parties: ELISHA HEADLER, PUBLIC ADMR., Appellants, v. SAMUEL P. CLOUD AND M. H. RITCHY, Respondent.
• Decision Date: 31 January 1873
• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Missouri

51 Mo. 301

ELISHA HEADLER, PUBLIC ADMR., Appellants,

v.SAMUEL P. CLOUD AND M. H. RITCHY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri.

January Term, 1873.

Appeal from Newton Circuit Court.

James F. Hardin, for Appellant.

McAfee & Phelps, for Respondent.

Plaintiff as administrator, sued Cloud & Ritchy on a note and certain account, due to the firm of Caynor & Co. Other facts appear in the opinion of the court.

ADAMS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes up on a demurrer to the petition. In the caption of the petition, the plaintiff describes himself “as public administrator,” having charge of the partnership estate of John H. Caynor & Co., but it nowhere appears in the petition, by any allegation, that he was public administrator of Greene County. The caption is simply a descriptio personœ and not a substantive allegation. The petition by proper averments ought to show the authority of the plaintiff, to bring such a suit. (State to use of Tapley's Admr. vs. Matson, 38 Mo., 489.)

The demurrer also raises the objection that a public administrator, cannot be ordered to take charge of partnership assets of a deceased partner.

It is urged that only the surviving partners or the administrator on the individual estate of his deceased partner, can be, allowed to administer on the partnership effects.

Our statute concerning public administrators, (see 1 W. S., 122, § 8,) provides that it shall be the duty of the public administrator to take into his charge, etc., estates of deceased persons in his county, when from any good cause, the Probate Court shall so order, to prevent their being injured, wasted purloined or lost.

The estate of deceased partners or their interest in partnership effects, form no exception to this rule.

If the contingency referred to exists, the Probate Court may make the order; but the court could make no such order if there was an existing administrator, having charge of the partnership effects.

It does not appear on the face of this petition, that there was any such existing administration on the partnership, and therefore this ground of demurrer was not properly taken.

A public administrator after letters testamentary or of administration are granted, must, under the orders of the court, account for, pay and deliver to such rightful executor or administrator, all money property, &c., of every kind, in his possession. (1 W. S., 122, § 11.) When a public administrator takes possession under the order of the court of an...