HEAPY ENGINEERING LLP v. PURE LODGING LTD.
| Decision Date | 11 July 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D02-2829.,1D02-2829. |
| Citation | 849 So.2d 424 |
| Parties | HEAPY ENGINEERING, LLP, Appellant, v. PURE LODGING, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Stephen H. Durant, Esquire, and Charles R. Walker, Jr., Esquire, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
E. Lanny Russell, Esquire, and Michael R. Freed, Esquire, of Smith Hulsey & Busey, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
Appellant, Heapy Engineering, LLP, seeks review of a summary final judgment entered against it and in favor of appellee, Pure Lodging, Ltd., on a claim for common law indemnity. Appellant also seeks review of the trial court's denial of its motion to strike two affidavits filed in support of appellee's summary judgment motion. We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to strike and denial of appellant's motion for summary judgment without further comment. However, we reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of appellee because of disputed issues of fact.
In order to prevail on a common law indemnity claim, the following two-pronged test must be satisfied: (1) the party seeking indemnity (the indemnitee) must be without fault and its liability must be solely vicarious for the wrongdoing of another, and (2) the party against whom indemnity is sought (the indemnitor) must be wholly at fault. See Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 642 (Fla.1999)
; Houdaille Indus., Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So.2d 490, 493 (Fla.1979). Once a legal obligation has been established in the underlying action on the part of the indemnitee, the indemnitor will become bound by a settlement agreement in a suit against the indemnitee if the indemnitor was given notice of the claim and was afforded an opportunity to appear and defend the claim, as long as the settlement was not the result of fraud or collusion. Bagley v. W. Cas. & Sur. Co., 505 So.2d 678, 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Appellee engaged Braun & Steidl Architects, Inc. to design two motels. Braun & Steidl in turn hired appellant to design the air ventilation system (HVAC) in the motels. Shortly after the motels opened, mold and mildew were discovered in the bathrooms, corridors, and stairwells. Appellee filed an arbitration claim against Braun & Steidl, alleging that Braun & Steidl was liable for the damage. As part of the settlement agreement, Braun & Steidl assigned its rights in contribution and/or indemnity against appellant to appellee.
Because our review of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Underwriters at Interest v. All Logistics Grp., Inc.
...or technically liable for the wrongful acts of the party from whom he is seeking indemnity. See Heapy Eng'g, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd. , 849 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003) (citation omitted); Fla. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am. , 763 So.2d 429, 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct......
-
Silberman v. Premier Beauty & Health LLC
... ... 2000) (per curiam)). See ... also Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Lab'ys, Inc. , 803 ... F.3d 518, 537 ... Fla. 2020) (citing Heapy ... Eng'g, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd. , 849 So.2d 424, ... ...
-
Osorio v. Betancourt
...and (2) the party against whom indemnity is sought (the indemnitor) must be wholly at fault.” See Heapy Engineering, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd., 849 So.2d 424, 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 642 (Fla.1999)). State Farm satisfies the......
-
ASSA Compañia De Seguros, S.A. v. Codotrans, Inc.
...wholly at fault.’ ” Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B., 857 F.Supp.2d 1312, 1314 (S.D.Fla.2012) (quoting Heapy Eng'g, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd., 849 So.2d 424, 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ); see also Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 642 (Fla.1999). Murano argues Codotran......
-
Indemnity actions
...party against whom indemnity is sought (the indemnitor) must be wholly at fault. Source Heapy Engineering, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd ., 849 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). See Also 1. Florida Employers Ins. Service Corp. v. Norco, Inc ., 723 So.2d 875, 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (See dissen......
-
Legal theories & defenses
...v. Western Casualty & Surety, Co. , 505 So.2d 678, 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). See Also Heapy Engineering, LLP v. Pure Lodging, Ltd. , 849 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). §18:230.1.2 Elements — 2d DCA The plaintiff must show that: (a) the insurer was given an opportunity to defend but wron......