Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Decision Date12 April 1966
Citation141 N.W.2d 178,30 Wis.2d 561
PartiesAlbert H. HEATER, Appellant, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO., a foreign corporation, Respondent.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

Phillips, Hoffman & Phillips, Milwaukee, for appellant.

Prosser, Zimmermann & Wiedabach, Milwaukee, for respondent.

BEILFUSS, Justice.

It is apparent from the memorandum opinion filed by the trial judge that the appellant made essentially the same argument to the trial court as has been made upon appeal.

The trial court's memorandum, in part, is as follows:

'It is evident from the complaint that the total disability of the plaintiff occurred prior to the issuance of the policy in question. The mortgage security insurance amendment rider to the accident policy, a copy of which is attached to the complaint, reads as follows:

"The definition of 'Sickness' as described in the policy is amended to read:

"'Sickness' wherever used in the policy means sickness or disease causing loss covered by the policy and which loss commences while the policy is in force as to the Insured Mortgagor; provided, however, loss resulting from sickness or disease for which the Insured Mortgagor received treatment or a recommendation for treatment by a legally qualified physician or surgeon during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the effective date of coverage as to the Insured Mortgagor shall not be covered hereunder until the policy has been in force as to the Insured Mortgagor for twelve months. After the policy has been in force for twelve months as to the Insured Mortgagor loss commencing thereafter and resulting from sickness for which treatment was rendered or recommenced during the twelve-month period immediately preceding the effective date of coverage as to such Insured Mortgagor shall be covered hereunder.'

'The claim of total disability is attributable to sickness covered under the primary policy related solely to 'sickness contracted and commencing after the effective date of this policy and resulting in loss covered by this policy.'

'It is contended by the plaintiff that the mortgage security insurance amendment rider, referred to above, broadens the concept of the term 'sickness' as set forth in the primary policy so as to include not only sickness which occurs subsequent to the issuance of the policy but also such illness as occurred prior to the issuance of the policy and continued on during the life of the policy.

'The plaintiff contends that the term 'loss' is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Badger Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • July 10, 2002
    ...to the majority's conclusion, however, complexity alone does not render the policy ambiguous. See Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966); Hause v. Bresina, 2002 WI App 188, 256 Wis.2d 664, 649 N.W.2d 736; Hinrichs v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001......
  • Sukala v. Heritage Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 2000
    ...N.W.2d 621 (1992). Policy language may still be unambiguous even when it is complex or cumbersome. See Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966). We will not rewrite an insurance policy to bind an insurer to a risk it did not contemplate unless the terms ......
  • Commercial Union Midwest v. Vorbeck
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 2003
    ...I am not the first appellate judge in Wisconsin to publicly share this view. Thirty-three years ago, in Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966), then Justice Bruce Beilfuss noted how the language of a disputed rider was "unnecessarily cumbersome, comple......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT