Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 12 April 1966 |
Citation | 141 N.W.2d 178,30 Wis.2d 561 |
Parties | Albert H. HEATER, Appellant, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO., a foreign corporation, Respondent. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
Phillips, Hoffman & Phillips, Milwaukee, for appellant.
Prosser, Zimmermann & Wiedabach, Milwaukee, for respondent.
It is apparent from the memorandum opinion filed by the trial judge that the appellant made essentially the same argument to the trial court as has been made upon appeal.
The trial court's memorandum, in part, is as follows:
'It is evident from the complaint that the total disability of the plaintiff occurred prior to the issuance of the policy in question. The mortgage security insurance amendment rider to the accident policy, a copy of which is attached to the complaint, reads as follows:
'The claim of total disability is attributable to sickness covered under the primary policy related solely to 'sickness contracted and commencing after the effective date of this policy and resulting in loss covered by this policy.'
'It is contended by the plaintiff that the mortgage security insurance amendment rider, referred to above, broadens the concept of the term 'sickness' as set forth in the primary policy so as to include not only sickness which occurs subsequent to the issuance of the policy but also such illness as occurred prior to the issuance of the policy and continued on during the life of the policy.
'The plaintiff contends that the term 'loss' is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Badger Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitz
...to the majority's conclusion, however, complexity alone does not render the policy ambiguous. See Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966); Hause v. Bresina, 2002 WI App 188, 256 Wis.2d 664, 649 N.W.2d 736; Hinrichs v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2001......
-
Sukala v. Heritage Mut. Ins. Co.
...N.W.2d 621 (1992). Policy language may still be unambiguous even when it is complex or cumbersome. See Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966). We will not rewrite an insurance policy to bind an insurer to a risk it did not contemplate unless the terms ......
-
Commercial Union Midwest v. Vorbeck
...I am not the first appellate judge in Wisconsin to publicly share this view. Thirty-three years ago, in Heater v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 30 Wis. 2d 561, 565, 141 N.W.2d 178 (1966), then Justice Bruce Beilfuss noted how the language of a disputed rider was "unnecessarily cumbersome, comple......