Hecht v. Hecht
| Decision Date | 18 December 1995 |
| Citation | 635 N.Y.S.2d 280,222 A.D.2d 589 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Sheri HECHT, Appellant, v. Jody HECHT, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Owen B. Walsh, County Attorney, Mineola (Julia Ryan Christ and Bernadine M. Koch, of counsel), for appellant.
Before MANGANO, P.J., and MILLER, COPERTINO, SANTUCCI and HART, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 to suspend a Child Support Order, dated March 31, 1993, on the ground that the mother Sheri Hecht violated a Visitation Order, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated August 15, 1994, which, after a hearing, suspended the Child Support Order.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the father's petition to suspend the Child Support Order is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
On appeal, the mother contends that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in suspending the Child Support Order since the father failed to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence. We agree and now reverse.
The record fails to establish that the mother's conduct rose to the level of "deliberate frustration" or "active interference" with the father's visitation rights (Weinreich v. Weinreich, 184 A.D.2d 505, 506, 585 N.Y.S.2d 769, 770; Chapin v. Chapin, 184 A.D.2d 1082, 586 N.Y.S.2d 909; Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, 164 A.D.2d 906, 908, 559 N.Y.S.2d 744). Instead, the record reveals that the mother did not comply with certain visitation requirements due to her financial situation, which was made worse by the father's failure to pay over $5,000 in past child support payments. Accordingly, we find that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the father's petition to suspend future child support payments.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jurgielewicz v. Johnston
...Echavarria, 48 A.D.3d 578, 578, 852 N.Y.S.2d 236;Matter of Lew v. Sobel, 46 A.D.3d 893, 895, 849 N.Y.S.2d 586;Matter of Hecht v. Hecht, 222 A.D.2d 589, 635 N.Y.S.2d 280). Here, the Family Court correctly determined that the father failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the mother d......
-
S.K. v. H.K.
...N.Y.S.2d 223 ; Kershaw v. Kershaw, 268 A.D.2d 829, 701 N.Y.S.2d 739 ; Hiross v. Hiross, 224 A.D.2d 662, 639 N.Y.S.2d 70 ; Hecht v. Hecht, 222 A.D.2d 589, 635 N.Y.S.2d 280.) The moving party must establish that the custodial parent's actions have risen to the level of deliberate frustration ......
-
Clum v. Seksinsky
...rose to the level of 'deliberate frustration' or 'active interference' with the father's visitation rights" (Matter of Hecht v. Hecht, 222 A.D.2d 589, 635 N.Y.S.2d 280 quoting Weinreich v. Weinreich, 184 A.D.2d 505, 506, 585 N.Y.S.2d We modify the order to grant that branch of the father's ......
-
Ortman v. Ortman
...Servs. v. Meehan, 252 A.D.2d 588, 590, 676 N.Y.S.2d 607; Hiross v. Hiross, 224 A.D.2d 662, 663, 639 N.Y.S.2d 70; Matter of Hecht v. Hecht, 222 A.D.2d 589, 635 N.Y.S.2d 280). In response to the motion, the Law Guardian alleged that there was an issue of fact whether plaintiff deliberately fr......
-
Beyond economic fatherhood: encouraging divorces fathers to parent.
...resources to assist them in enforcing visitation. Id. (302) Sipos v. Sipos, 425 N.Y.S.2d 414, 415 (App. Div. 1980); cf. Hecht v. Hecht, 635 N.Y.S.2d 280, 281 (App. Div. 1995) (reversing suspension of child support because the interference with visitation did not constitute "deliberate (303)......