Hedgepeth v. WHITMAN WALKER CLINIC

Decision Date01 March 2010
Docket NumberNo. 07-CV-158.,07-CV-158.
Citation990 A.2d 455
PartiesTerry HEDGEPETH, Appellant, v. WHITMAN WALKER CLINIC, et al., Appellees.
CourtD.C. Court of Appeals

BEFORE: WASHINGTON, Chief Judge; RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, KRAMER, FISHER, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, THOMPSON, and OBERLY, Associate Judges.

Prior report: 980 A.2d 1229.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the response thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted, and the opinion and judgment of October 1, 2009, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall file its brief within 30 days from the date of this order, appellee shall file its brief within 30 days after filing of appellant's brief. Any responsive brief shall be filed within 20 days thereafter. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hedgepeth v. Clinic
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 2011
    ...to preclude appellant's claim that his doctor's negligent misdiagnosis caused him serious emotional injury. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 990 A.2d 455 (D.C.2010). After reviewing the development of the law on this issue and the reason for the Williams zone of physical danger test, we ......
  • CESARANO v. REED SMITH LLP, 07-CV-1065.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 2010
    ...990 A.2d 455 Danielle R. CESARANO, Appellant, v. REED SMITH LLP, Appellee. No. 07-CV-1065. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 24, 2009. Decided March 4, 2010.990 A.2d 457 Bruce A. Fredrickson, with whom Cedar P. Carlton, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellant. J......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT