Heilmann v. State, 5D02-1873.
| Citation | 832 So.2d 834 |
| Decision Date | 15 November 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D02-1873.,5D02-1873. |
| Parties | Joel P. HEILMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joel P. Heilmann II, Sanderson, Pro Se. Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Joel P. Heilmann seeks review of the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the circuit court. Heilmann raises issues which were or could have been raised in the direct appeal of his conviction, and, therefore cannot be raised in a habeas corpus petition. See Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1016 (Fla.1999)
. Additionally, the issues now asserted were raised in his two prior postconviction proceedings. Accordingly, Heilmann's petition is successive. See Johnson v. Singletary, 695 So.2d 263, 265-66 (Fla.1996).
AFFIRMED.
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cook v. Crosby, 1D05-2355.
...motions; hence the petition was procedurally barred. See Frazier v. State, 898 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Heilmann v. State, 832 So.2d 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. 1. Although a razor knife/box cutter was not designed or constructed to cause de......
-
Jenkins v. State, 5D04-776.
...or on matters that were not objected to at trial. Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1025 (Fla.1999); see also Heilmann v. State, 832 So.2d 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), rev. dism'd, 845 So.2d 890 (Fla.2003). Accordingly, we AFFIRMED. THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur. ...
-
Frison v. State
...motions. The denial of those motions were affirmed by this court. Accordingly, Frison's petition is successive. See Heilmann v. State, 832 So.2d 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). GRIFFIN, J., and COBB, W., Senior Judge, concur. ...