Heller v. State, 91-3070

Decision Date28 July 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-3070,91-3070
Citation601 So.2d 642
PartiesWilliam Steven HELLER, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent. 601 So.2d 642, 17 Fla. L. Week. D1813
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

On Writ of Prohibition to the Circuit Court for Dade County; David Tobin, Judge.

Leighton G. Morse, Key West, George T. Pallas, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Schreiber, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

While this appeal was pending, we decided J.T. v. State, 601 So.2d 283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (citing Tascarella v. Seay, 564 So.2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)), which is dispositive. The fifteen-day window period provided the State by rule 3.191(i)(3), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to proceed with a trial of the defendant after the speedy trial period has expired and a motion for discharge has been filed, may not be extended for exceptional circumstances by a motion filed within the window period.

Prohibition is granted. The order denying the motion for discharge is quashed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT