Hemming Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co.
Decision Date | 10 April 1917 |
Docket Number | 2368. |
Citation | 243 F. 595 |
Parties | HEMMING MFG. CO. v. CUTLER-HAMMER MFG. CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Charles Neave, of New York City, for appellant.
W Clyde Jones, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing for want of equity appellant's bill for alleged infringement of the Muller patent 869,321, October 29, 1907, for insulating material and method of manufacturing the same.
The claims in suit and the material parts of the specification are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. Umbach, 9641.
...claims 1 and 5 fail to meet the requirements of Sec. 33, Title 35 U.S.C.A., and are void for that reason. See Hemming Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 243 F. 595, 600; Health Products Corp. v. Ex-Lax Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 22 F.2d 286, Plaintiff in its bill of particulars charged that......
-
United States Gypsum Co. v. Bestwall Mfg. Co.
...sustainable unless the specification discloses at least one practicable way in which to make the product. Hemming Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co., 243 F. 595, 600, 156 C. C. A. 243. The so-called demonstration made by Brown at the Grand Rapids plant, and the disclosures in his applicatio......
-
National Theatre Supply Co. v. Da-Lite Screen Co., 5887.
...not sustainable unless the specification discloses at least one practicable way in which to make the product. Hemming Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co. (C.C. A.) 243 F. 595, 600. If, instead of describing his structure, the applicant mentions its quality and asks the court to infer a proce......
- R.E. Dietz Co. v. Burr & Starkweather Co.