Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Sw. Elec. Power Co.

Decision Date26 May 2011
Docket NumberNo. 10–1094.,10–1094.
CitationHempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Sw. Elec. Power Co., 2011 Ark. 234, 385 S.W.3d 123 (Ark. 2011)
PartiesHEMPSTEAD COUNTY HUNTING CLUB, INC., Petitioner v. SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY et al., Respondents.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Columbia Ins. Grp., Inc. v. Cenark Project Mgmt. Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 28, 2016
    ...decline to address them, as answering the questions would constitute an improper advisory opinion. Hempstead Cty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Sw. Elec. Power Co., 2011 Ark. 234, 385 S.W.3d 123.Certified questions moot.Danielson and Hart, JJ., dissent.Paul E. Danielson, Justice, dissenting. I diss......
  • Pennebaker v. Furry Feet Retreat, Inc.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • March 31, 2021
  • Stanley v. Ozarks Elec. Coop. Corp.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 2019
    ...law of contracts, torts, or property, which would fall outside the jurisdiction of the PSC.In Hempstead County Hunting Club, Inc. v. Southwest Electric Power Co. , 2011 Ark. 234, 385 S.W.3d 123, the plaintiff brought suit alleging that the public utility was violating Arkansas statutes by f......
  • Douglas v. First Student, Inc.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 3, 2011
    ...Supreme Court Rule 6–8(c)(1), this court has the authority to reformulate a certified question. See Hempstead Cnty. Hunting Club, Inc. v. Sw. Elec. Power Co., 2011 Ark. 234, 385 S.W.3d 123. In this instance, after further review, we have determined that the more specific question being aske......
  • Get Started for Free