Hemraj v. Hemraj, 92-0993

Decision Date23 June 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-0993,92-0993
Citation620 So.2d 1300
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D1484 Beverly HEMRAJ, Appellant, v. Goordial HEMRAJ, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Lynn G. Waxman of Lynn G. Waxman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ronald E. Jones of Ronald E. Jones, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

STONE, Judge.

We reverse a final judgment of dissolution. In denying alimony, the trial court omitted the findings of fact mandated by section 61.08(1), Florida Statutes.

Although the pleadings do not contain a specific demand for alimony, that issue was clearly tried by implied consent. The wife's pretrial statement provided for "non-deductible, non-reportable permanent periodic alimony," as a disputed issue to be tried. That statement also listed "security" for alimony as an issue. The husband raised objections to portions of the wife's pretrial statement, but none were directed to the alimony claim. In opening statements at trial, the wife's lawyer argued for alimony and the husband's lawyer argued against it on grounds of her alleged misconduct, but no question was raised concerning whether it was an issue before the court. In closing, the wife requested $800-$1,000 per month alimony and the husband's attorney asserted that she was not entitled to it because she had chosen a low earning career and was guilty of adultery. Again, no question was raised concerning alimony as an issue.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(b) provides:

when issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendment of the pleadings as may be necessary to cause them to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after judgment, but failure to so amend shall not affect the result of the trial of these issues....

We do note that in Cooper v. Cooper, 406 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), this court vacated an alimony award because no such relief was requested in the pleadings. However, in that case an objection to considering the issue was raised at trial, along with a claim of prejudice due to the absence of any notice. Obviously, these factors are not present in this case.

We also reverse the child support award for further consideration as the record reflects that the wrong percentage figures with respect to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Whight v. Whight
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 1994
    ...the issue of the applicability of the guideline statute was fully tried by implied consent. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(b); Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Owca v. Zemzicki, 137 So.2d 876, 878 (Fla. 2d DCA Ordinarily, a child support determination lies within the trial court's ......
  • Smith v. Smith
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2007
    ...such instances, may be treated by the trial court as if they had been properly pled. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(b); Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (finding alimony issue was tried by implied consent in dissolution action, despite absence of pleadings specifically ......
  • Chapoteau v. Chapoteau, 95-265
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 1995
    ...Collins v. Collins, 655 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Miller v. Miller, 625 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Based on the foregoing reasoning, we reverse the final judgment of dissolution, except insofar as it dissolves the marriage, an......
  • Bryan v. Bryan, 1D99-3492.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 16, 2000
    ...herself. The issue is properly before us for review. See Purvis v. Purvis, 732 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Shrine v. Shrine, 429 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA "This court has held that rehabilitative alimony cannot be awarded absent a rehab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Florida family law rules of procedure
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law Trial Notebook
    • April 30, 2022
    ...Hemraj v. Hemraj Wife’s claim for alimony may be tried by consent even where wife failed to request it in pleadings. Hemraj v. Hemraj , 620 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Byers v. Callahan Implied consent does not exist when the opposing party objects to the argument or the introduction of......
  • Trial and evidence
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • April 30, 2022
    ...notwithstanding absence of pleading or notice of claim, where record reveals that the issue was tried by consent); Hemraj v. Hemraj, 620 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (although pleadings in dissolution action did not contain specific demand for alimony, issue was tried by implied consent,......
  • Final judgment; rehearing; motions related to judgment
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • April 30, 2022
    ...Musso v. Musso , 670 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (permitting amendment under rule 1.190(b) as to partition); Hemraj v. Hemraj , 620 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (although pleadings in dissolution action did not contain specific demand for alimony, issue was tried by implied consent; w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT