HENDRYX v. JOHNSON BOYS FORD-MERCURY, INC.

Decision Date02 October 2003
Citation309 A.D.2d 1260,765 N.Y.S.2d 549
PartiesLEE HENDRYX, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>JOHNSON BOYS FORD-MERCURY, INC., et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Present — Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendants judgment dismissing the amended complaint after a bench trial. Although the order is subsumed in the judgment that was subsequently entered and the appeal properly lies from the judgment, not the order (see Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]), in the exercise of our discretion, we treat the notice of appeal as one taken from the judgment (see CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]).

Supreme Court properly granted judgment in favor of defendants and dismissed the amended complaint. Contrary to plaintiff's contentions, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in its rulings regarding the scope of cross-examination of plaintiff at trial (see Feldsberg v Nitschke, 49 NY2d 636, 643 [1980], rearg denied 50 NY2d 1059 [1980]).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Lazar v. Lazar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Enero 2015
    ...order and judgment in appeal No. 2, and we thus dismiss the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 (see Hendryx v. Johnson Boys Ford–Mercury, 309 A.D.2d 1260, 1261, 765 N.Y.S.2d 549 ; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608 ). We address first de......
  • Lazar v. Lazar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Enero 2015
    ...order and judgment in appeal No. 2, and we thus dismiss the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 ( see Hendryx v. Johnson Boys Ford–Mercury, 309 A.D.2d 1260, 1261, 765 N.Y.S.2d 549; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608). We address first def......
  • Dick v. State Univ. Constr. Fund
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Febrero 2015
    ...entered its order (see Chase Lincoln First Bank, N.A., 89 A.D.3d at 1477, 933 N.Y.S.2d 151 ; Livingston County Support Collection Unit, 309 A.D.2d at 1260, 765 N.Y.S.2d 564 ).It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without...
  • Kovalsky-Carr Elec. Supply Co. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Julio 2015
    ...to treat the notice of appeal as valid and deem the appeal to be from the judgment (see CPLR 5520[c] ; Hendryx v. Johnson Boys Ford–Mercury, 309 A.D.2d 1260, 1260, 765 N.Y.S.2d 549 ). In appeal No. 2, defendants appeal from an order that granted plaintiff's motion seeking, inter alia, to di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT