Henenberg v. Winn
Decision Date | 15 December 1927 |
Docket Number | (No. 2077.) |
Citation | 1 S.W.2d 432 |
Parties | HENENBERG v. WINN et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Louis Wilson, Judge.
Suit by E. F. and F. W. Winn against J. Henenberg. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
O. F. Wencker and Hattie L. Henenberg, both of Dallas, for appellant.
Ross M. Scott, of Dallas, for appellees.
Appellant, Henenberg, of New York City, was the owner of a brick building in Dallas, Tex. The west wall of the building was situate upon a strip of land 17 inches wide fronting upon Elm street, being on the east side of the west one-half of lot 25, in block G/2/170.
By deed dated July 22, 1913, J. D. Smith and wife conveyed to Henenberg the east 8½ inches of said tract and one-half interest in the party wall, the land so conveyed being described as follows:
"Beginning at the N. E. corner of said west half of said lot 25 in said block G/2/170, the said point being 25 feet east from the N. W. corner of said lot 25, running thence in a southerly direction along the division line of said west half of said lot 25, and at right angles to Elm street, and along the east line of a brick wall now standing on said premises 100 feet to a stake for corner; thence westerly and parallel with Elm street 8½ inches; thence northerly and parallel with said east line of said lot 25, in said block G/2/170, 100 feet to Elm street; thence easterly with Elm street 8½ inches to the place of beginning."
By deed dated July 1, 1921, Henenberg and wife, in consideration of $30,500, conveyed to the appellees Winn Bros. a tract of land in said block described as follows:
Subsequently appellees brought this suit against Henenberg, the first count of the petition being in the statutory form of trespass to try title to the two tracks above described; the second count in the petition being, in substance, for reformation of the deed and recovery of the 8½-inch strip of land.
Henenberg answered by pleas of misjoinder of causes of action, nonjoinder of Mrs. Henenberg as a necessary party defendant, general and special exceptions, not guilty, and general denial. No proposition is here presented with respect to the court's ruling upon the exceptions and plea of nonjoinder.
Upon trial the plaintiffs introduced in evidence the two deeds above mentioned.
H. H. Jacoby, a real estate agent, testified in their behalf that he knew the Henenberg property on the south side of Elm street with a brick house on it and sold the building to Winn Bros., for the price Henenberg authorized him to sell it, after showing the building to them. He sent the deed to New York, and it was mailed to a niece of Henenberg in Dallas in whose office the deal was finally closed. Appellees testified that the building was shown to them by Jacoby, and it clearly appears it was contemplated by them and the agent that the entire building and the ground upon which it was situate was to be conveyed. After...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett Trust
...v. City of Uvalde, Tex.Com.App., 42 S.W.2d 417; Adams v. Houston Nat. Bank, Tex.Com.App., 1 S.W.2d 878, 880 and 881; Henenberg v. Winn, Tex.Civ. App., 1 S.W.2d 432, 434. See also Lawrence v. Cananea Consol. Copper Co., Tex. Civ.App., 237 S.W. 959, 962, writ dismissed; First Nat. Bank v. Cor......
-
Cheffer v. Eagle Discount Stamp Co.
... ... 268, 150 N.E. 3; State v. Hills, 94 Ohio ... St. 171, 113 N.E. 1045; Gobbel v. Columbia Ry. G. & E ... Co., 107 S.C. 367, 93 S.E. 137; Henenberg v ... Winn, 1 S.W.2d 432; Kladivo v. Melberg, 210 ... Iowa 306, 227 N.W. 833; Mattauch v. Ridell Auto Co., ... 138 Iowa 22, 115 N.W. 509. The ... ...
-
Rose v. State
...relief in equity to make the judgment speak the truth. See Conn v. Hagan, 93 Tex. 334, 55 S.W. 323 (1900); Henenberg v. Winn, 1 S.W.2d 432 (Tex.Civ.App.1928, writ ref'd). We reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals dismissing the appeal, reinstate the appeal, and we affirm the jud......
-
Olvey v. Jones, 1873-7688.
...500, 83 S.W. 799; Pegues v. Dilworth, 134 Tex. 169, 132 S.W.2d 582; Laufer v. Moppins, 44 Tex.Civ.App. 472, 99 S.W. 109; Henenberg v. Winn, Tex. Civ.App., 1 S.W.2d 432, writ refused; Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, Sec. On the other hand, if the parties agreed upon a sale of an undi......