Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie
Decision Date | 21 December 1903 |
Citation | 77 S.W. 607 |
Parties | HENNE & MEYER v. MOULTRIE. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by Henne & Meyer against Paul Moultrie. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal to the Court of Appeals, which certifies questions to the Supreme Court. Questions answered.
E. A. Wallace and Henderson, Morrison & Freeman, for appellants. N. H. Tracy, James Bass, and Moore & Moore, for appellee.
These are certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District. The statement and questions are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nabours v. McCord
...it is the duty of the appellate court to apply the law to the facts, and to render judgment in accord therewith. Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie (Tex. Sup.) 77 S. W. 607; Parrish & Potter v. Frey, 18 Tex. Civ. App. 278, 44 S. W. 322; H. & T. C. R. R. v. Martin, 21 Tex. Civ. App. 209, 51 S. W. 641......
-
Gulf Refining Co. v. Bonin
...and grant a new trial, which relief was not asked. R. C. S. art. 1990; Heimer v. Yates (Tex. Com. App.) 210 S. W. 680; Henne v. Moultrie, 97 Tex. 216, 77 S. W. 607; Railway Co. v. Strycharski, 92 Tex. 1, 37 S. W. 415; Walker v. Ames (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 365; Duke v. Walter (Tex. Civ. ......
-
Michelin Tire Co. v. Ganter, 11232.
...as the court below should have rendered, that is, for plaintiff, and it is so ordered. See article 1856, R. S. 1925; Henne v. Moultrie, 97 Tex. 216, 77 S. W. 607; Weierhauser v. Bennett (Tex. Civ. App.) 19 S.W.(2d) 572; Whitis v. Penry (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S.W.(2d) 736; Welch v. U. S. Fideli......
-
Thornton v. Athens Nat. Bank
...verdict, but it cannot render judgment in the face of the verdict. Railway v. Strycharski, 92 Tex. 10, 37 S. W. 415; Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie, 97 Tex. 216, 77 S. W. 607; Ablowich v. Bank, 95 Tex. 432, 67 S. W. 79, 881; Waller v. Liles, 96 Tex. 21, 70 S. W. 17; Telegraph Co. v. James, 41 Te......