Henri v. Grand Lodge of United Ancient Order of Druids of Missouri

Decision Date31 March 1875
Citation59 Mo. 581
PartiesANTONIA HENRI, Respondent, v. THE GRAND LODGE OF UNITED ANCIENT ORDER OF DRUIDS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, and THE OCCIDENTAL GROVE No. 16, U. A. O. D., Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

Jecko & Hospes, for Appellants.

F. & L. L. Gottschalk, for Respondent.

HOUGH, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff, as widow of Joseph Henri, deceased, to recover the sum of $500, alleged to be due to her under the charter and by-laws of the defendant--the Occidental Grove No. 16, of the United Ancient Order of Druids, and the Grand Grove of said Order--which held in trust and controlled the disbursements of all funds belonging to said Occidental Grove, of which her said husband was a member at the time of his death, which by-laws provided, that on the death of a member, in good standing, who had paid all his assessments and dues, the widow or heirs should receive the sum of $500.

Plaintiff alleged a compliance on the part of her husband, with all the requirements of the organization in relation to the payment of dues and assessments, and that her husband was a member in good standing.

Defendants admitted their incorporation, and denied the other allegations of the petition.

The case was submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts: “It is agreed by and between the parties to this suit, that this cause be submitted upon the following state of facts: Defendants are incorporated by act of the General Assembly, 1864-1865, (see p. 223) Exhibit A. p. 23 to 38, incl., are the by-laws of the defendant, the Occidental Grove, No. 16. Exhibit B. are the by-laws of the defendants, governing the mutual aid fund. Exhibit C. are the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, the Grand Grove of the U. A. O. D., from page 3 to 19, incl.; and the constitution of the subordinate Groves in the State of Missouri, from page 20 to 30, incl. Plaintiff is the widow of Joseph Henri, deceased, who was, up to his death, which occurred on the 17th day of October, 1871, and had been for more than a year previously a member of the defendant, the Occidental Grove No. 16. He had paid up all regular dues up to the time of his death; but an assessment of fifty cents, which had been made by said Grove, on October, 4th, 1871, remained unpaid at the time of his death; that the secretary of said Grove, on October 4th, 1871, carried a letter containing the notice of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Blanchard v. Wolff
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 21, 1876
    ... ... WOLFF, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Missouri, St. Louis.March 21, 1876 ... Pacific ... R. R. Co., 45 Mo. 236; Henri v. Grand Lodge, 59 Mo ... 581; United States v ... Session Acts 1869, p. 17. In order to take an appeal under ... this section, of ... ...
  • Blanchard v. Wolff
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 21, 1876
    ...1021, sec. 48, p. 1034, sec. 3, p. 1060, secs. 44, 45; Coleman v. McKnight, 4 Mo. 83; Routsong v. Pacific R. R. Co., 45 Mo. 236; Henri v. Grand Lodge, 59 Mo. 581; United States v. Gamble et al., 10 Mo. 457; London v. King, 22 Mo. 336; Christy v. Myers, 21 Mo. 112; Blonset v. Zink, 55 Mo. 45......
  • Murphy v. De France
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1890
    ...the plaintiff or defendant shall require." It cannot be left to agreement of counsel what shall go in a bill of exceptions. Heim v. Grand Lodge, 59 Mo. 581; Leftwich v. Leeon, 4 Wall. 187; Lyon Thompson, 16 Ia. 62; Morrison v. Lehew, 17 Mo.App. 633. (2) The decree of the lower court is for ......
  • Ozark Plateau Land Co. v. Hays
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1891
    ...language in which they reach us cannot be enlarged beyond its plain and express scope. Munford v. Wilson (1852), 15 Mo. 540; Henri v. Grand Lodge (1875), 59 Mo. 581. the law now governing proceedings in this court, we are not warranted in reversing a judgment, unless we can point out error ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT