Henry Pilcher's Sons, Inc. v. Martin
Decision Date | 31 July 1931 |
Citation | 136 So. 386,102 Fla. 672 |
Parties | HENRY PILCHER'S SONS, Inc. v. MARTIN et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Pinellas County; John U. Bird, Judge.
Action by Henry Pilcher's Sons, Inc., against R. M. Martin and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
Syllabus by the Court.
The law is that an unincorporated church organization cannot be made liable on its contracts. Nor can an officer of such church organization be made liable in his official capacity; but a contract signed by an officer in his official capacity binds him individually and not the church.
Where a suit is on a written instrument alleged to be a promissory note executed 'Board of Stewards of B Church, by A. M Secretary,' and the declaration attempts to fix a liability on each of the members of the board of stewards of such church in his official capacity as an officer of the church, such declaration should be held bad on demurrer. The board of stewards is an unincorporated church organization.
Where the secretary of a board of stewards executed a note 'The Board of Stewards of B Church by A. M. Secretary,' the obligation does not bind the board of stewards in their official capacity on the contract, and there can be no authority vested in the secretary to bind a board of stewards in its official capacity by such execution of the contract. This is a matter of law of which the payee was charged with notice, and therefore the payee took the contract with knowledge imputed that it was executed without legal authority and such payee could not enforce such contract against the secretary.
A note executed 'The Board of Stewards of B Church by A. M Secretary,' does not bind the members of the board of stewards individually because the members of such board have not purported to execute the contract as individuals. Had the members of the board of stewards as individuals signed the note, then they as individuals could have been held liable for its payment.
There is a distinction between the liability of one who signs a note as an official of an unincorporated church organization who by signing such note becomes personally liable for the payment thereof, and the liability of one who signs a note in the name of an official board of such unincorporated church organization, in which latter case the execution binds no one in any capacity.
Gage & Polhill, of Clearwater, and Hampton, Bull & Crom, of Tampa, for plaintiff in error.
Baskin & Jordan and Jones & White, all of Clearwater, for defendants in error.
In this case a second amended declaration was filed in words and figures as follows:
'Now comes the plaintiff in the above entitled cause, by leave of the court, and files the following second amended declaration and sues R. M. Martin, E. R. Turner, Frank Schwabel, H. B. Astor, Paul Morrison, D. F. Crawford, R. A. Calhoun, Douglas Bailey, W. C. Tucker, Byrd McMullen, R. Barton, A. E. Jackson, R. L. Rogers, E. J. Daniel, W. G. Mizzell, E. W. McMullen, A. G. McQuagge, J. R. Thomas, G. H. Shaw, J. E. Wicker, Harold Abrams, H. H. Constantine, Jr., John Manse, H. H. Baskins, T. J. Watkins, J. P. Clarkson, E. C. Hogan, Z. B. Littlejohn, Luke Martin, A. E. Purvience, J. W. Reed, J. F. Ruff, George D. Tompkins, J. Atkinson, George F. Washburn, H. W. Bivins and E. A. Turner, trading as the Board of Stewards of Clearwater M. E. Church, Clearwater, Florida, an unincorporated religious society, for that:
The notes sued on were attached to the declaration and made a part thereof and were signed as follows:
'The Board of Stewards, Clearwater
M. E. Church
'By A. G. McQuagge, Sec. to the Board.'
Demurrer was filed to the declaration. Separate demurrers were filed by several defendants. All demurrers were sustained.
The plaintiff refusing to plead further, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants.
First we must consider the question as to whether or not the 'Board of Stewards of Clearwater M. E. Church, Clearwater, Florida, an unincorporated religious society,' may be held...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peeples v. Enochs,
... ... Independent ... Klan of Am. D. C., Inc., 11 F.2d 881; Blount v ... Sixteenth St. Baptist Church ... Richardson (Cal.), 218 P. 487; Pileher v. Martin ... (Fla.), 136 So. 386; Hunt v. Adams, 149 So. 24; ... ...
-
Ross v. Gerung
...because of the rule of law that an unincorporated church organization cannot be made liable on its contracts. Henry Pilcher's Sons, Inc. v. Martin, 102 Fla. 672, 136 So. 386, and authorities cited. In our view the principle contended for by the appellants does not control the present litiga......
-
First Nat. Bank v. Filer
... ... promise to pay to the order of Whitphel Properties, Inc., two ... thousand and no/100 dollars Payable at City ... (5th Ed.) § 303; Henry Pilcher's [107 Fla. 532] ... Sons, Inc., v. Martin, 102 ... ...
-
Bryce v. Bull
... ... Henry Pilcher's Sons, Inc., v. Martin (Fla.) 136 ... So. 386, ... ...