Henry Street Settlement v. Town of Yorktown

Decision Date18 April 1983
Citation461 N.Y.S.2d 355,93 A.D.2d 855
PartiesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT, Appellant, v. The TOWN OF YORKTOWN, a municipal corporation, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Cuddy & Feder, White Plains (Thomas R. Beirne and Ruth E. Roth, White Plains, of counsel), for appellant.

Arthur J. Selkin, Town Atty., Yorktown Heights (Sirlin & Sirlin, Mamaroneck [Roger H. Sirlin, Mamaroneck], of counsel), for respondents.

Before GIBBONS, J.P., and THOMPSON, BRACKEN and NIEHOFF, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, to declare plaintiff's subject "Camp Echo Hill" property exempt from real estate taxation and to reinstate the exemption existing until the defendants changed the status of plaintiff's real property from tax exempt to fully taxable on the 1979 assessment roll, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 24, 1982, which dismissed the complaint.

Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting the provision dismissing the complaint and substituting a provision declaring that the property is not exempt and that it was properly placed on the assessment roll. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with Special Term that the minimal activities of plaintiff at the subject site during the time period in issue provide no basis for the grant of tax exemption for that assessment roll (1979 roll, 1980 taxes). However, the court should have made an appropriate declaration (see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, 229 N.Y.S.2d 380, 183 N.E.2d 670, app. dsmd. 371 U.S. 74, 83 S.Ct. 177, 9 L.Ed.2d 163).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Penfield Tax Protest Group v. Yancey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 23, 1994
    ...954, 540 N.Y.S.2d 982, 538 N.E.2d 334; Pyramid Co. of Auburn v. Chu, 177 A.D.2d 970, 577 N.Y.S.2d 1015; Henry St. Settlement v. Town of Yorktown, 93 A.D.2d 855, 461 N.Y.S.2d 355). We modify the judgment, therefore, by reinstating the petition and by granting judgment in favor of respondents......
  • People v. Carter
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 20, 1987
    ... ... Henry, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Mark D. Cohen, of counsel), for ... ...
  • People v. Camacho
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 17, 1987

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT