Henry v. Jones

Decision Date09 December 1969
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 67-293.
Citation306 F. Supp. 726
PartiesSandra L. HENRY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eugene W. JONES et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

David C. Engel, Exeter, N. H., for plaintiffs.

Andrew B. Goodspeed, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

GARRITY, District Judge.

This is a diversity action in tort for damages arising out of a collision between two motor vehicles within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The parties have agreed that the tort law of Massachusetts applies. Plaintiff Sandra L. Henry was a passenger in a vehicle operated by her husband, plaintiff Harry C. Henry, when their vehicle was struck by defendant's vehicle. At the time of the accident, Mrs. Henry was pregnant with viable twin fetuses which were subsequently stillborn, and she also is suing as administratrix of the estates of Baby Boy Henry "A" and Baby Boy Henry "B". The complaint alleges that their deaths while en ventre sa mere were the result of injuries sustained in the collision. The case is presently before the court on defendants' motion to dismiss the action for the wrongful deaths of the stillborn children.

The issue presented is whether a viable fetus that is not born alive is a "person" within the meaning of Massachusetts' Wrongful Death statute. Mass.G.L. c. 229, § 2 (as amended through St.1967, c. 666, § 1).1 That question will not be decided by resort to abstractions as to the definition of legal personality but rather by asking whether the Massachusetts policy for recovery for prenatal injuries will give the estate of a stillborn infant a right to recover damages under the Wrongful Death statute.

This set of facts has never been squarely presented to the courts of Massachusetts. However, the Supreme Judicial Court has decided that a wrongful death action does exist for prenatal injuries to both viable and non-viable fetuses resulting in their deaths after being born alive. See Keyes v. Construction Service Inc., 1960, 340 Mass. 633, 165 N.E.2d 912 (viable) and Torigian v. Watertown News Co. Inc., 1967, 352 Mass. 446, 225 N.E.2d 926 (non-viable).

In the court's opinion, the Massachusetts courts would hold that the distinction between infants born alive and those stillborn is of such significance that recovery under the Wrongful Death statute will be denied to the latter. In both Keyes, 340 Mass. at 636, 165 N.E.2d 912 and Torigian, 352 Mass. at 447, 225 N.E. 2d 926 the fact that the infants were born alive was stressed by the Supreme Judicial Court. In the Keyes case, the court went so far as to say in dictum, 340 Mass. at 637, 165 N.E.2d at 915 that "if the child was stillborn the plaintiff would have no right of action."

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 16 Julio 1975
    ...prior decisions, squarely in point, in Keyes v. Construction Serv. Inc., 340 Mass. 633, 165 N.E.2d 912 (1960), and Henry v. Jones, 306 F.Supp. 726 (D.Mass.1969), and clear language in Torigian v. Watertown News Co. Inc., 352 Mass. 446, 448, 225 N.E.2d 926 (1967). We noted how far we had gon......
  • Miller v. Highlands Ins. Co., 75--1446
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Agosto 1976
    ...212 (1972); McKillip v. Zimmerman, 191 N.W.2d 706 (Iowa 1971); Leccese v. McDonough, 361 Mass. 64, 279 N.E.2d 339 (1972); Henry v. Jones, 306 F.Supp. 726 (D.Mass.1969); Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N.Y.2d 478, 301 N.Y.S.2d 65, 248 N.E.2d 901 (1969); Lawrence v. Craven Tire Co., 210 Va. 138, 169......
  • Day v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Marzo 1976
    ...See Smith v. Brennan, 1960, 31 N.J. 353, 157 A.2d 497.4 E.g., Woods v. Lancet, 1951, 303 N.Y. 349, 102 N.E.2d 691.5 E.g., Henry v. Jones, D.Mass.1969, 306 F.Supp. 726; Sinkler v. Kneale, 1960, 401 Pa. 267, 164 A.2d 93.6 See Smith v. Brennan, supra.7 For further references in harmony with ou......
  • Leccese v. McDonough
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 7 Febrero 1972
    ...held that the child 'was a 'person' within the meaning of G.L. c. 229, § 2, as amended.' A 1969 case applying Massachusetts law, Henry v. Jones, 306 F.Supp. 726, 727 (D. Mass.), correctly concluded that the Massachusetts 'courts would hold that the distinction between infants born alive and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT