Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, Inc.
| Citation | 677 N.Y.S.2d 617,253 A.D.2d 789 |
| Decision Date | 21 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | STORES-FINAST |
| Parties | , 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 7837 Dorothy HERBERT, et al., Respondents, v. EDWARDS SUPER FOODSUPERMARKETS, INC., Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Fixler & Gulino, LLP, New York City (Frank Gulino, of counsel), for appellant.
Joel S. Kaplan, Garden City (Michael Lowe, of counsel), for respondents.
Before O'BRIEN, J.P., and SULLIVAN, JOY and FRIEDMANN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered September 12, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict finding it 75% at fault in the happening of the accident and the plaintiff Dorothy Herbert 25% at fault and finding that the plaintiff Dorothy Herbert suffered total damages in the amount of $300,000 and the plaintiff William Herbert suffered total damages in the amount of $25,000, is against it and in favor of the plaintiff Dorothy Herbert in the principal sum of $225,000 and the plaintiff William Herbert in the principal sum of $18,750.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Dorothy Herbert was injured when she slipped and fell inside the defendant's supermarket. After a jury trial on the issue of liability, the defendant was found to be 75% at fault in the happening of the accident and Ms. Herbert 25% at fault. Thereafter, a trial on the issue of damages was conducted during which the defendant made a last-minute request to adjourn the case so that he might attempt to secure the testimony of Ms. Herbert's private physician, Dr. Luigi Capobianco. The defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the court acted improvidently in denying the adjournment application.
As a general rule, the granting or refusing of a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court (Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, Inc., 88 A.D.2d 136, 143, 452 N.Y.S.2d 220). The record indicates that the defendant failed to exercise due diligence in obtaining the testimony of Dr. Capobianco. Although the defendant had notice more than a year before trial that Dr. Capobianco was Ms. Herbert's private physician, the defendant took no steps until the trial on the issue of damages to subpoena Dr. Capobianco's records or to secure his presence at the trial. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the court's refusal to adjourn the trial on the issue of damages was an improvident...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In the Matter of Vilair Fonvil v. Denexandre
...the Supreme Court's sound discretion ( see Farrell v. Gelwan, 30 A.D.3d 563, 817 N.Y.S.2d 143; Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores–Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617; Klombers v. Lefkowitz, 131 A.D.2d 815, 816, 517 N.Y.S.2d 179; Michaels v. Dalimonte, 121 A.D.2d 370, 502......
-
Frey v. Chiou
...36 A.D.3d 821, 822, 828 N.Y.S.2d 496; Colon v. Bailey, 26 A.D.3d 454, 455, 810 N.Y.S.2d 511; Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores–Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617). The plaintiffs also failed to demonstrate a potentially meritorious cause of action. Accordingly, the Sup......
-
Matter of Weinstock v. Yeshivoth
...decision to grant or deny an adjournment is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Herbert v Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789; Natoli v Natoli, 234 A.D.2d 591). The petitioner sought a 30-day adjournment of a hearing on the issue of standi......
-
Telford v. Laro Maintenance Corp.
...denying the plaintiffs a continuance to produce a witness from NYNEX (see, Reo v. Klarman, 259 A.D.2d 477; Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789; cf., Evangelinos v Reifschneider, 241 A.D.2d 508). The plaintiffs failed to exercise due diligence in securing......
-
Judicial conduct
...Mount Sinai Hospital Center, 15 A.D.3d 189, 789 N.Y.S.2d 132 (1st Dept. 2005); Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dept. 1998). However, it is an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a continuance where the application is prop......
-
Judicial conduct
...Sinai Med. Ctr. , 15 A.D.3d 189, 789 N.Y.S.2d 132 (1st Dept. 2005); Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, Inc. , 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dept. 1998). However, it is an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a continuance where the application is properly......
-
Table of cases
...v. City of New York, 12 A.D.3d 209, 783 N.Y.S.2d 807 (1st Dept. 2004), § 18:60 Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dept. 1998), § 17:15 Herbst v. Marshall , 89 A.D.3d 1403, 933 N.Y.S.2d 461 (4th Dept. 2011), § 20:30 Hernandez v. Pac......
-
Judicial conduct
...Mount Sinai Hospital Center, 15 A.D.3d 189, 789 N.Y.S.2d 132 (1st Dept. 2005); Herbert v. Edwards Super Food Stores-Finast Supermarkets, 253 A.D.2d 789, 677 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dept. 1998). However, it is an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a continuance where the application is prop......