Hering v. Hilton

Decision Date22 March 1957
Docket Number093.,Gen. No. 10
Citation140 N.E.2d 737,13 Ill. App.2d 132
PartiesMary E. Hering, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garlin Hilton, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Young & Sullivan, and James E. Murphy, attorneys for Garlin Hilton, defendant-appellant.

Elliott B. Young, and John D. Sullivan, of counsel.

Lybarger & Collins, and Keith F. Scott, attorneys for Mary E. Hering, plaintiff-appellee.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE REYNOLDS.

Reversed.

Not to be published in full.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Bernier v. Skripek
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 7 Agosto 1967
    ...the statute is Hering v. Hilton, 12 Ill.2d 559, 147 N.E.2d 311. Mary Hering appealed from a judgment of the Appellate Court (13 Ill.App.2d 132, 140 N.E.2d 737) which reversed a judgment of the circuit court entered on a jury verdict allowing the plaintiff $7,000 as damages for personal inju......
  • Pree v. Hymbaugh
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 22 Octubre 1959
    ...to this court we held that as a matter of law, defendant was not guilty of wanton and wilful misconduct and reversed the cause (13 Ill.App.2d 132, 140 N.E.2d 737). Having granted leave to appeal, The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the cause to the Appellate Court with directions to rec......
  • Hering v. Hilton
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 24 Enero 1958
    ...BRISTOW, Justice. This court has allowed plaintiff, Mary E. Hering, leave to appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Court (13 Ill.App.2d 132, 140 N.E.2d 737) which reversed a judgment of the circuit court of McDonough County, entered on a jury verdict allowing plaintiff $7,000 as damages f......
  • Neurohr v. Richmond
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 4 Enero 1967
    ...damages in the amount of $7,000.00. The defendant appealed from the judgment entered on this verdict, and the Appellate Court, 13 Ill.App.2d 132, 140 N.E.2d 737 reversed the case, holding that the defendant was not guilty of wilful and wanton conduct as a matter of law. The Illinois Supreme......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT