Herman v. Village of Hillside

Decision Date26 November 1958
Docket NumberNo. 34760,34760
Citation15 Ill.2d 396,155 N.E.2d 47
PartiesKathryn HERMAN et al., Appellees, v. The VILLAGE OF HILLSIDE, Appellant.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

Sullivan, Jeffers & Doheny, John J. Dillon, Albert J. Jantorni, Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson, Louis Ancel and McMahon & Plunkett, Chicago (James J. Doheny, Arthur D. Welton, Jr., Edward J. Wendrow, Edward L. Foote and George H. Masek, Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.

Macleish, Spray, Price & Underwood, and Francis X. Cuisinier, Chicago (Joseph W. Townsend and Joseph N. Morency, Jr., Chicago, of counsel), for appellees.

HOUSE, Justice.

A declaratory judgment action was filed against the village of Hillside by Kathryn Herman and other individual members of the Holland family as the fee owners of a tract within the limits of the village, and joined by a corporate plaintiff, Vulcan Materials Company, successor after the trial to the leasehold interest of the original corporate plaintiff. They seek to have the 1948 zoning ordinance of the village, as amended, declared invalid as to the property owned by the individual plaintiffs, and a declaration that the lessee has the right to use the property for quarry purposes. The master's report, to which objections were filed, was approved and a decree was entered by the circuit court of Cook County declaring the ordinance invalid and void as applied to the property. The decree is appealed directly to this court since the trial judge certified that in his opinion the public interest so requires.

The individual plaintiffs are the owners of a 40-acre tract, except for a small portion taken off the southwest side for the Congress Street Expressway, which has been in their family since shortly after the Civil War. There is located upon the land a deposit of dolomite, a high medium magnesium carbonate, commonly known as limestone, in excess of 280 feet thick. It is quarriable, is used primarily for building and road construction, and meets the specifications for coarse aggregate of the Illinois State Highway Department.

Quarrying operations were commenced on the tract many years ago by the grandfather of the individual plaintiffs, and have been continued on a much larger scale by the present quarry company and its predecessors since 1929 on a semicircular 8 1/2-acre tract off the east side thereof. The quarry company had attempted to acquire the remainder of the tract, consisting of 23.59 acres, either by purchase or lease, for many years dating back as early as 1934. The Holland family would not consider leasing the tract in controversy during the lifetime of the individual plaintiffs' mother who lived in the old homestead thereon. It was otherwise practically vacant and unimproved, except that the westerly 22 acres had been used as a golf course for a period ending in 1945. After the mother's death in 1953 negotiations were revived and resulted in a long-term lease between the individual owners and the quarry company. The latter owned a 39-acre tract east of and adjacent to the Holland tract, and 43-acre tract lying immediately south of the 39 acres. Extensive quarrying operations have been conducted for many years on the 39-acre tract and on the northerly portion of the 43-acre tract, in addition to the 8 1/2 acres leased from the Hollands. A substantial part of the 43-acre tract has been condemned and is being incorporated in the Congress Street Expressway which runs roughly from northwest to southeast, cuts off the southwest corner of the Holland tract and runs just south of the south line of the 39 acres, but takes in the southeast corner of the 39-acre tract for an interchange.

The present quarry consists of a quarry hole or pit 250 feet deep at its deepest point. Offices, shops, crushers, conveyors, elevators, a ready-mix plant and other equipment usually associated with a large quarry operation are located on the east side of the 39-acre tract. Stock piles are maintained to a height of 35 or 40 feet along the railroad siding which skirts the east boundary of the 39-acre tract, and contain crushed stone in 8 or 9 sizes from 3/16 up. The stone from all three of the tracts is processed and stored on the east end of the 39 acres.

The subject tract is bounded by Harrison Street and Congress Street Expressway on the south, and Forest Street on the west. A strip of vacant land lies immediately north of it, the plant of the Aluminum Company of America is upon the land next north, which in turn is bounded on the north by Madison Street. Mannheim Road runs along the east side of the 39-acre quarry tract.

The village of Hillside adopted its general zoning ordinance in 1948. That part of the Holland property lying west of a north-south line drawn approximately 50 to 60 feet west of the most westerly part of the area being actively used for quarrying at that time was zoned residential. The 39-acre tract, and that portion east of the line were zoned 'C' industrial, which permitted quarrying. The quary company was granted a certificate of nonconforming use as to the 43-acre tract prior to its condemnation for the expressway. The strip lying immediately north of the Holland and quarry company property was zoned 'A' industrial, for light manufacturing use, while the Aluminum Company's strip was zoned 'B' industrial, for heavy industrial use. Under the original ordinance all the land lying west of Forest Avenue extended, between Harrison and Madison streets, and that lying south of Harrison was zoned residential.

In January 1953, the ordinance was amended to create a 'B-1' business zone. All of the tract west of the subject property between Forest Avenue on the east and Wolf Road on the west, a distance of about 1/2 mile, was classified to permit the construction of a large shopping center comprising 60 retail stores built around the Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. establishment, and a parking lot. Approximately the southwest half is now occupied by the shopping center and the northeast half lying north of the expressway is used as a 5,000 automobile parking lot for the shopping center. During the pendency of these proceedings before the master, the subject property was reclassified for light manufacturing use and that is its present classification. In addition to those heretofore noted, the adjacent land uses consist of a single-family residential area to the northwest of the Holland tract most of which has been built since 1948, an older residential section lying south of the Holland property and south of the expressway. Tracks of the Illinois Central railroad roughly parallel the expressway approximately 500 feet south therefrom. A greenhouse lies in the triangle of the tracks bounded on the north by Harrison Street and on the east by Forest Avenue extended from the southwest corner of the Holland land. The greenhouse separates the subject property from the new $7,000,000 high school being constructed on a 65-acre tract to the southwest. The southwest corner of the Holland tract is 2,000 feet from the closest school building and 1,100 feet from the closest corner of the school's athletic field. To the east of the 39-acre tract there is a built-up residential area in the village of Bellwood and just south of that another residential area in the village of Westchester.

Plaintiffs take the position that the village may not arbitrarily deprive them of a normal and lawful use of their property where the disadvantage to the public is inconsequential and the effect upon the owners is confiscatory. The village contends that zoning of the subject tract to light industrial use which would prevent the extension of quarrying operations is proper, particularly when the quarrying operation is a nuisance in fact.

The testimony is voluminous. Eighteen witnesses from the villages of Bellwood and Hillside testified. Those living an Bellwood were closest to the east or processing end of the quarry company's operation and they expressed annoyance and discomfort caused by blasting manifesting itself in the form of noise, concussion, vibration and dust blowing on their premises from the stock piles. The Hillside residents who are farther from the processing operation made similar complaints except that they did not complain of dust deposits since the prevailing wind is toward the quarry. The blasts from dynamiting were variously referred to as being strong enough to crack foundations, down to strong vibrations and tremors. Plaintiffs furnished much scientific testimony relative to the methods used to minimize the effect of blasting and gave accurate measurement showing that the sounds arising from the quarrying operations were not greater than traffic and other noises customary in urban areas. An air-pollution expert, after taking measurements extending over a period of 12 days, concluded that the dust fall is less than that expected in an industrial area and below that usually found in the suburbs of a large city. An examination of all the evidence leads to the conclusion that the quarry is an unsightly operation which is distasteful to residents in the immediate area. The noise and tremors from blasting and the dust...

To continue reading

Request your trial
34 cases
  • Fredman Bros. Furniture Co., Inc. v. Department of Revenue
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 21 Noviembre 1985
    ...N.E.2d 1148; see also Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Allphin (1975), 60 Ill.2d 350, 358, 326 N.E.2d 737; Herman v. Village of Hillside (1958), 15 Ill.2d 396, 407-08, 155 N.E.2d 47.) Here, Fredman Brothers' multiple remedies consisted of a hearing on its assessment before the Department and ......
  • In re Application of County Collector, 97165.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 20 Octubre 2005
    ... ... See Village of Dolton v. First National Bank of Blue Island, 12 Ill.2d 435, 440, 147 N.E.2d 62 (1957) ("Our ... ...
  • Lake County v. MacNeal
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 23 Marzo 1962
    ...before there is judicial intervention. (See: Bright v. City of Evanston, 10 Ill.2d 178, 185, 139 N.E.2d 270; Herman v. Village of Hillside, 15 Ill.2d 396, 408, 155 N.E.2d 47.) And whether the rule should be extended to defendant-owners, as well as to those who are plaintiffs, is again a mat......
  • People ex rel. Petersen v. Turner Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 15 Abril 1976
    ...826 (1969). See also Ill. Bell Telephone Co. v. Allphin, 60 Ill.2d 350, 357--9, 326 N.E.2d 737 (1975); Herman v. Village of Hillside, 15 Ill.2d 396, 408, 155 N.E.2d 47 (1958); Peoples Gas Light Co. v. Slattery, 373 Ill. 31, 44, 25 N.E.2d 482 (1939); Bright v. City of Evanston, 10 Ill.2d 178......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 8 COUNTY REGULATION OF MINERAL DEVELOPMENT
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Western Land Use Regulation and Mined Land Reclamation (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...to the individual owning the mineral. An example of this balancing test being employed is Herman v. Village of Hillside, 15 Ill.2d. 396, 155 N.E.2d 47 (1958), as modified on denial of rehearing January 22, 1959. In Herman, the plaintiff wanted to extend a limestone quarrying operation from ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT