Hermann v. Bahrami
| Decision Date | 18 February 1997 |
| Citation | 236 A.D.2d 516,654 N.Y.S.2d 158 |
| Parties | Richard HERMANN, Respondent-Appellant, v. Paul BAHRAMI, Appellant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP, New York City (Neal M. Goldman and Melissa Georges, of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
Littman Krooks & Roth, P.C., New York City (Scott N. Gelfand, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
Before O'BRIEN J.P., and JOY, FRIEDMANN and FLORIO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, (1) the defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered September 28, 1995, as (a) denied his cross motion to dismiss the plaintiff's first, second, and fourth causes of action, and (b) granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to confirm an arbitration award against the nonparty corporation Originit Fabrics, Inc., inter alia, granting the plaintiff back pay, and (2) the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the same order as (a) granted that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to dismiss his sixth cause of action, and (b) denied that branch of his motion which was to amend his complaint to add a seventh cause of action to recover attorneys' fees.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as confirms an arbitration award against a nonparty to this action is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the defendant is not aggrieved thereby (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint so as to add a cause of action to recover attorneys' fees, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff is not collaterally estopped from bringing an action sounding in tort against the defendant in his individual capacity because of a previous arbitration award in favor of the plaintiff against a corporation of which both the plaintiff and the defendant were principals. In his present complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant committed tortious or predatory acts independent of any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Travelers Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Dormitory Auth.-State of N.Y.
...or incurred." Shindler v. Lamb, 25 Misc.2d 810, 211 N.Y.S.2d 762, 765 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Cnty.1959); see also Hermann v. Bahrami, 236 A.D.2d 516, 654 N.Y.S.2d 158, 159 (App. Div.2d Dep't 1997) (describing Shindler as a "well-recognized exception to the general rule" on attorney's fees); Restatemen......
-
Imrie v. Ratto
...affd 10 A.D.2d 826, 200 N.Y.S.2d 346 [1960], affd 9 N.Y.2d 621, 210 N.Y.S.2d 226, 172 N.E.2d 79 [1961] ; see Hermann v. Bahrami, 236 A.D.2d 516, 516, 654 N.Y.S.2d 158 [1997] ; Badik v. Murphy, 160 A.D.2d 1199, 1200, 555 N.Y.S.2d 206 [1990] ; Fugazy Travel Bur. v. Ernst & Ernst, 31 A.D.2d 92......
-
Mazarella v. Electropep Datacom Products, Inc.
...pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see, Murtha v. Yonkers Child Care Assn., 45 N.Y.2d 913, 411 N.Y.S.2d 219, 383 N.E.2d 865; Hermann v. Bahrami, 236 A.D.2d 516, 654 N.Y.S.2d 158; BIB Constr. Co. v. City of Poughkeepsie, 204 A.D.2d 947, 612 N.Y.S.2d 283; Bank of N.Y. v. Berisford Intl., 190 A.D.2d......