Hernandez v. Hernandez, 83-1216
| Decision Date | 27 December 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-1216,83-1216 |
| Citation | 444 So.2d 35 |
| Parties | Carlos HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. Vivian R. HERNANDEZ, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Max A. Goldfarb, Miami, for appellant.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Arnold Ginsberg, Miami, Roger Bridges, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. The parties were married in 1974 and have one minor child. During the marriage, the husband attended a foreign medical school aided by the financial support of the wife, his parents, and tuition loans. The husband filed his petition for dissolution of marriage in 1982, shortly after his graduation. Since that time, he has been unsuccessful in four attempts to pass the medical examination required for a license to practice in the United States. At the time of entry of the judgment dissolving the marriage he was employed as an assistant in a medical clinic earning a net $160 per week--less than that earned by the wife in her position as a legal secretary.
Recognizing the husband's present inability to pay permanent or rehabilitative alimony, yet seeking to compensate the wife for her financial contributions to the husband's education, the trial court assessed the present value of the husband's medical training at "in excess of One Million Dollars," and ordered him to pay the wife twenty-five percent of his net income as a special equity or an equitable distribution. The payments were to be made monthly, to commence only when the husband began to practice medicine until $250,000 was paid. That provision of the final judgment presents the main issue in this appeal.
In Hughes v. Hughes, 438 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), we held that an educational degree is not property subject to distribution as lump sum alimony in a dissolution of marriage proceeding because its value, which must be measured by future earning capacity, is too speculative to calculate. This reasoning applies equally to a special equity, which is a vested interest in property brought into or acquired during the marriage because of contribution of services or funds over and above normal marital duties. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1200 (Fla.1980). Therefore, we reverse the award granting the wife $250,000 as a special equity or an equitable distribution in "the fruits of the husband's medical career." 1
We also reverse the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Villaverde v. Villaverde, s. 88-2003
...to that extent should not be distributed to the wife. See Dewberry v. Dewberry, 455 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984); Hughes v. Hughes, 438 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see also Moebus v.......
-
Jahnke v. Jahnke, No. 3D01-1316
...cannot award relief that was not requested in the pleadings. See Hines v. Hines, 494 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); McDonald v. McDonald, 732 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). However, the former wife's rule 1.540 motion was not a "pleadi......
-
Venus Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz
...v. Flanders, 516 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); George Vining & Sons v. Jones, 498 So.2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984); Fine v. Fine, 400 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA The final judgment under review is re......
-
Arce v. Arce
...in the rule of law that a professional degree is not itself "property" subject to distribution as lump sum alimony. Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984); Hughes v. Hughes, 438 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).6 In Bedell the wife sought ......
-
§ 9.02 States without Express Statutes
...v. Hill, 12 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1612 (D.C. Super. 1985). Florida: Joachim v. Joachim, 942 So.2d 3 (Fla. App. 2006); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. App. 1983); Hughes v. Hughes, 438 So.2d 146 (Fla. App. 1983). Georgia: Lowery v. Lowery, 262 Ga. 20, 413 S.E.2d 731 (1992). Illinois:......