Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., Inc., 98-774.
Citation | 730 So.2d 344 |
Decision Date | 10 March 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 98-774.,98-774. |
Parties | Orlando D. HERNANDEZ and Miguelina Hernandez, Appellants, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Merritt, Sikes & Leach, Miami, for appellant.
Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.
This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in a declaratory action finding no insurance coverage for the loss of the appellant's leased vehicle. We reverse.
The appellants, Orlando D. Hernandez and his wife, Miguelina, were named insureds under an automobile insurance policy issued by the appellee, United Automobile Insurance Company ("insurer"). The policy provided collision coverage which extended to driver(s) who operated the vehicle with the express permission of the named insureds and who did not permanently reside in their household.1 While this policy was in full force and effect, the Hernandez's leased vehicle was involved in a serious collision with another vehicle resulting in severe injuries to the driver of the other vehicle. The driver of the Hernandezes' vehicle immediately fled the scene and was otherwise unidentifiable by anyone present.
When the insurer declined coverage and denied a duty to defend,2 the Hernandezes filed this declaratory action asserting, among other things, that at the time of the accident, they had lent their vehicle to their neighbor, Johnny Torres. Accordingly, they maintained that because this vehicle was being operated by someone with their express permission, the insurer had an obligation to defend and indemnify them under the policy. The insurer filed a motion for final summary judgment based upon Mr. Torres' sworn denial of being the driver of the appellants' vehicle at the time of the accident and the Hernandezes' inability to otherwise refute Mr. Torres' sworn testimony. The trial court granted this motion. We conclude, without reaching other related issues raised, that this was error.
A movant for a summary judgment must conclusively establish the nonexistence of genuine issues of material fact. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla. 1985). In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, it is well-established that the court may neither adjudge the credibility of the witnesses nor weigh the evidence. See Pita v. State Street Bank and Trust Co., 666 So.2d 268, 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ( ); Juno Indus., Inc. v. Heery Int'l, 646 So.2d 818, 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) ( ); Shapiro v. Barron, 538 So.2d 1319, 1320 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) ( ); Kuczkir v. Martell, 480 So.2d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) ( ); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gant, 460 So.2d 912, 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) ( ); Strickland v. Strickland, 456 So.2d 583, 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lin v. Demings
...214 (Fla. 1953) ); Alvarez–Mejia v. Bellissimo Props., LLC , 208 So.3d 797, 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citing Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co. , 730 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ).The burden is on the movant to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of material fact. See Holl v. Talc......
-
Gonzalez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.
...compared to other evidence cannot be resolved on summary judgment but must be left for the trier of fact. Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 730 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, it is well-established that the court may neither adjudge the cre......
-
Keys Country Resort, LLC v. 1733 Overseas Highway, LLC
...or weight of the evidence cannot be resolved on summary judgment, but must be left for the trier of fact. Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 730 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, it is well-established that the court may neither adjudge the cre......
-
United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Progressive Rehab. & Orthopedic Servs., LLC
...show evidence of a nature that would be admissible at trial ...." Gonzalez, 273 So. 3d at 1036 (citing Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 730 So. 2d 344, 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ). "It is well established that affidavits ... which are based entirely upon speculation, surmise and conjecture,......
-
Chapter 12-1 Introduction
...of the evidence cannot be resolved on summary judgment, but must be left for the trier of fact. Hernandez v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 730 So. 2d 344, 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, it is well-established that the court may neither adjudge the credibility ......