Herndon v. Yates
Decision Date | 16 March 1917 |
Docket Number | No. 18132.,18132. |
Citation | 194 S.W. 46 |
Parties | HERNDON et al. v. YATES et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Platte County; Alonzo D. Burnes, Judge.
Action by Nancy Herndon and others against Wm. S. Yates, who died during pendency of suit; his heirs being brought in as defendants by an amended petition. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Norton B. Anderson, of Platte City, and George W. Day, of Kansas City, for appellants. W. H. Haughawout and Gray & Gray, of Carthage, for respondents.
This is an action to determine interest in a certain tract of land in Platte county. Defendants were defeated below, and appeal. The action was begun against William S. Yates, who died during the pendency of same in the lower court. His heirs were, by an amended petition, brought in as defendants, and thereafter the pleadings and proceedings ran in their several names. But the cause being here entitled as above, we shall not disturb it, but merely note the fact for the purpose of identification.
The land in dispute is that certain 53 1/3 acres of land in the east half of the northwest quarter of section 12, in township 53 north of range 34 west, which lies north of Smith's fork of Platte river. The common source of title is James R. Shackelford, who conveyed the land by his deed containing covenants of warranty to Safrona E. Lutes (we follow the orthography of the deed) on the 4th day of February, 1868, for a recited consideration of $1,066.66. Six days thereafter there was executed and acknowledged (or attempted so to be) and delivered to said James R. Shackelford and one Amos Carpenter by said Safrona E. Lutes and E. P. Lutes, her husband, the below copied instrument, bearing date February 10, 1868, which, being sui generis, we set out in full, inasmuch as we are unable to apply any known part of the nomenclature of the law in apt designation of it. It is, to wit:
In August, 1869, Safrona E. Lutes departed this life, leaving surviving her E. P. Lutes, her husband, who thereupon became seised of a curtesy estate for life in the land here in controversy, and three infant girls, Rebecca, Nancy, and Elizabeth, aged then six, four, and two years, respectively, who married in 1885, 1882, and 1885, respectively, who since the dates last above have been, and now are, under coverture, and who with their respective husbands are the plaintiffs in this case.
On the 1st day of August, 1871, pursuant at least to the agreement of extension indorsed on the above instrument, the balance of $128 of the purchase price of this land fell due. Almost immediately thereafter the land was advertised for sale thereunder, and sold for the sum of $136.50, being about the amount due on the purchase price, including costs of foreclosure, and on said sale was bought by said E. P. Lutes, who was seemingly in possession thereof as holder of the life estate therein by curtesy.
While a so-called trustee's deed which was executed by Amos Carpenter and James R. Shackelford to E. P. Lutes recited that there was due and unpaid the whole sum of the original purchase price this is so patently an error and is so opposed to the true facts that we state those facts as they existed and not as the above instrument recites them. Said Lutes in October, 1873, sold and conveyed this land by warranty deed to William Yates, who was the original defendant herein, and Yates for almost 40 years and till his death remained in the adverse possession of it, claiming the same in fee. Lutes married again prior to the making of this conveyance to Yates, and is yet living, though averred to be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. Bowen
...De Hatre v. Edmonds, 200 Mo. loc. cit. 273, 98 S. W. 744, 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 86; Lewis v. Barnes, 272 Mo. 377, 199 S. W. 212; Herndon v. Yates, 194 S. W. 46; Armor v. Frey, 253 Mo. loc. cit. 477, 161 S. W. 829; Bradley v. Goff, 243 Mo. 95, 147 S. W. In the case of Bradley v. Railroad, 91 M......
-
Carr v. Barr
... ... Howell v. Jump, 140 Mo. 441; Shumate v ... Snyder, 140 Mo. 77; Hall v. French, 165 Mo ... 430; Graham v. Ketchum, 192 Mo. 25; Herndon v ... Yates, 194 S.W. 46; Powell v. Brown, 214 S.W ... 142. (e) The plaintiffs were remaindermen and their estate ... was subject to two ... ...
-
Mathis v. Melton
... ... divested by said statute, as it was not effective against ... her. [Powell v. Bowen, supra, l. c. 296; Herndon ... v. Yates, 194 S.W. 46, l. c. 48; Armor v. Frey, supra; ... Bradley v. Goff, 243 Mo. 95, 147 S.W. 1012; ... Hauser v. Murray, 256 Mo. 58, 165 ... ...
-
Willis v. Robinson
...Hauser v. Murray, 256 Mo. 58, 86; Barnes v. Keys, 127 P. 261; Coulson v. La Plant, 196 S.W. 1144; Nichols v. Hobbs, 197 S.W. 258; Herndon v. Yates, 194 S.W. 46; R. S. sec. 1970; Armor v. Frey, 253 Mo. 474; Matlack v. Kline, 190 S.W. 408. (6) Parol evidence is not admissible on the question ......