HERON v. GAYLOR

Decision Date09 March 1948
Docket NumberNos. 4958,Nos. 4957,Nos. 4956,s. 4956,s. 4957,s. 4958
Citation52 N.M. 23,190 P.2d 208
PartiesHERON v. GAYLOR et al. (two cases). SAME v. JAYNES et al.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

[190 P.2d 208, 52 N.M. 23]

Kenneth A. Heron, of Chama, per se.

Harry L. Bigbee, of Santa Fe, for appellees.

BRICE, Chief Justice.

These are companion cases and may be disposed of by one opinion.

The trial court at the close of the testimony in each of these cases announced in effect that he would discard all of the testimony of the appellant, a witness in his own behalf, and upon which his right to recover depended; and he then proceeded to determine each case upon the testimony introduced by the respective defendants.

We have examined the appellant's testimony carefully, and are of the opinion that there was no such inherent improbability as to the truthfulness of appellant's testimony that would authorize such action on the part of the trial court.

We are of the opinion that the appellant did not have a fair and impartial trial in each of these cases, because of the unwarranted refusal of the trial court to consider his testimony in making its decision;and that justice requires a new trial in each case. Testimony of a witness, interested or not, cannot arbitrarily be disregarded by the trier of the facts. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. Martin, 283 U.S. 209, 51 S.Ct. 453, 75 L.Ed. 983; Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275, 101 P.2d 398.

The judgment in each of the respective causes is reversed with instruction to the trial court to set it aside and grant to the appellant a new trial.

It is so ordered.

LUJAN, SADLER, and COMPTON, JJ., and E. T. HENSLEY, Jr., D. J., concur.

McGHEE, J., did not participate.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Tauch v. Ferguson-Steere Motor Co.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1957
    ...well established. Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275, 101 P.2d 398; Citizens Finance Co. v. Cole, 47 N.M. 73, 134 P.2d 550; and, Heron v. Gaylor, 52 N.M. 23, 190 P.2d 208. Its force may be effectively weakened by severe cross-examination but, whether so or not, it may not be made the basis for aw......
  • CHAVEZ v. CHAVEZ
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1950
    ...Erroneous or mistaken findings as to facts in issues afford no ground for vacating the judgment.' To the same effect: Heron v. Gaylor et al., 52 N.M. 23, 190 P.2d 208; Wallis v. Mulligan, 20 N.M. 328, 148 P. 500; Ealy v. McGahen, 37 N.M. 246, 21 P.2d 84; Porter v. Alamocitos Land & Livestoc......
  • Alto Village Services Corp. v. New Mexico Public Service Commission
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1978
    ...upon the truth or accuracy of the testimony. Tauch v. Ferguson-Steere Motor Company, 62 N.M. 429, 312 P.2d 83 (1957); Heron v. Gaylor, 52 N.M. 23, 190 P.2d 208 (1947); Medler v. Henry, 44 N.M. 275, 101 P.2d 398 (1940). The rule applies in this case. We do not find in the record anything whi......
  • Howard v. Singleton, 5335
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • December 26, 1950
    ...Howard to sell a ranch for $10,000 which he had bought on a contract. We do not have the situation here that was present in Heron v. Gaylor, 52 N.M. 23, 190 P.2d 208, where we held the trial court had arbitrarily disregarded all testimony of Heron. The action of the court in this regard was......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT