Herrick v. Woodson
Decision Date | 04 April 1910 |
Parties | HERRICK v. WOODSON. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; James T. Neville, Judge.
Action by Sam Herrick against J. A. Woodson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Patterson & Patterson, for appellant. Silsby & Delaney, for respondent.
This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace in Greene county and went to the circuit court on appeal after judgment for defendant. The plaintiff, Sam Herrick, is engaged in the business of selling real estate for a commission. He and the defendant, J. A. Woodson, are citizens of the city of Springfield. Plaintiff seeks to recover of defendant a commission for having obtained a purchaser for defendant's property in pursuance of an agreement whereby plaintiff listed defendant's property and undertook to sell the same. After hearing the plaintiff's evidence the court sustained a demurrer to the same and instructed the jury that plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and a verdict was accordingly returned for the defendant. The case is here on appeal.
Plaintiff testified that defendant saw him in Hunter's grocery store, and, after asking how business was, said, "By the way, while you are showing people around, bring them over and show them my property." Plaintiff's testimony continues: Plaintiff further testified that he first found that the property was not for sale the day after he had sent Dr. Sherman out to look at it; that he had then entered into a written contract with Dr. Sherman and had received a check for $100 from Dr. Sherman.
William Schelfritz, a neighbor of defendant, testified:
H. D. Hunter, the owner of the grocery store where the property was listed, corroborated Mr. Herrick as to what was said by the defendant in listing his property with the plaintiff.
H. M. Smith, the cashier of the Farmers' & Merchants' Bank, in regard to the loan, testified substantially the same as the plaintiff, saying that he knew the loan was for Dr. Sherman.
Ira Herrick, son of the plaintiff, who went with his father in the buggy to see the defendant, testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Frye v. Warren
... ... His ... refusal alone creates a cause of action in favor of the ... broker. [Sallee v. McMurry, 113 Mo.App. 253, 264, 88 ... S.W. 157; Herrick v. Woodson, 143 Mo.App. 258, 264, ... 127 S.W. 391; Brown v. Smith, 113 Mo.App. 59, 68, ... 70, 87 S.W. 556; Ennis v. Eager, 152 Mo.App. 493, ... ...
-
Frye v. Warren
...alone creates a cause of action in favor of the broker. Sallee v. McMurry, 113 Mo. App. 253, 264, 88 S. W. 157; Herrick v. Woodson, 143 Mo. App. 258, 264, 127 S. W. 391;. Brown v. Smith, 113 Mo. App. 59, 68, 70, 87 S. W. 556; Ennis v. Eager, 152 Mo. App. 493, 133 S. W. 850. The fact that de......
- Marchand v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company
-
Hilmer v. Decher
...principal will place himself in a position to make a good title. See also Butler v. Moser, Mo.App., 226 S. W. 990, 991; Herrick v. Woodson, 143 Mo. App. 258, 127 S.W. 391. In the last above-named case it was held that where the owner refused to sell after the agent had produced a buyer who ......