Hess v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Ass'n, Inc.
| Decision Date | 13 August 1959 |
| Docket Number | CO-OPERATIVE |
| Parties | Claim of Catherine HESS, alleged widow of Charles Hess, deceased, Respondent, and the Claim of Marie Hess, alleged adult dependent child, Respondent, v. DAIRYMEN'S LEAGUEASSOCIATION, INC. and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Galli, Terhune, Gibbons & Mulvehill, New York City, for appellants.
Morris A. Feuerstein, Bay Shore, for Catherine Hess.
Abraham Markhoff, New York City, for Marie Hess.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., for Workmen's Compensation Board (Gilbert M. Landy, New York City, of counsel).
Before BERGAN, J. P., and COON, GIBSON, HERLIHY and REYNOLDS, JJ.
Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen's Compensation Board for death benefits. Appellants contest the findings (1) that Catherine Hess was decedent's widow and (2) that Marie Hess was a totally disabled dependent child (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 16).
On August 25, 1926 decedent's then wife obtained an interlocutory judgment of divorce which became final on December 8, 1926. A purported ceremonial marriage between decedent and claimant was performed on September 7, 1926 but was, of course, void. Landsman v. Landsman, 302 N.Y. 45, 96 N.E.2d 81. While the record would support a finding of a common-law marriage between decedent and claimant prior to April 29, 1933 (the effective date of chapter 606 of the Laws of 1933 section 11 of the Domestic Relations Law), provided there was then no impediment thereto, apparently decedent's former wife was then living, as claimant testified that at a time which other events fix as subsequent to that date decedent was proceeded against for nonpayment of alimony. Respondent would have us assume an order permitting remarriage but it was 'incumbent upon the claimant to establish her status as the legal widow of the employee', McLaskey v. City of New York, 277 App.Div. 1068, 100 N.Y.S.2d 694, 696, and this she failed to do.
The finding that Marie Hess is a dependent child whose disability is total and permanent is supported by substantial evidence. Her physician testified that she suffers from epilepsy, is subject to grand mal seizures and is completely incapacitated for employment.
Decision and award as to Marie Hess affirmed and as to Catherine Hess reversed and claim dismissed, without costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nichols v. C.N.Y. Bottle Co.
...at the time. It is true that a claimant has the burden of proof of establishing status as a widow (see, Matter of Hess v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Assn., 9 A.D.2d 585, 189 N.Y.S.2d 296, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 975, 244 N.Y.S.2d 778, 194 N.E.2d 687). Here, claimant testified that she was married to ......
-
Hess v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Assn., Inc
...etc., Respondents. Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 31, 1963. Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, 9 A.D.2d 585, 189 N.Y.S.2d 296. Workmen's compensation case. The Board made an award of death benefits, and an appeal was The Appellate Division held that claiman......
- Gorden's Estate, In re