Hess v. Denman Lumber Co., (No. 2157.)
Decision Date | 02 February 1920 |
Docket Number | (No. 2157.) |
Citation | 218 S.W. 162 |
Parties | HESS v. DENMAN LUMBER CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Camp County Court; C. E. Bryson, Judge.
Suit by the Denman Lumber Company against Aubrey Hess. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered for defendant.
The appellant was the owner of a lot in Pittsburg, Tex., upon which he desired to build a two-story frame residence to be occupied as a homestead by himself and his family. On April 26, 1917, appellant and his wife entered into a written contract with J. A. Knight by the terms of which J. A. Knight contracted and agreed to build the residence and to furnish all the lumber and material required for that purpose; the appellant to pay J. A. Knight $4,500, as follows, $1,000 cash upon the completion of the building, and a promissory note for $3,500 payable in five annual installments of $700 each on April 20th of each year, and to secure the payment of the note a mechanic's and materialman's lien was to be given on the lot and improvements. The terms of the contract were fully complied with by the appellant and his wife, and J. A. Knight duly registered his lien in the county clerk's office. J. A. Knight made an assignment of the contract and transferred the note to Frank Davis on April 26, 1917. In the terms of the assignment of the contract Frank Davis was to pay J. A. Knight the $3,500 called for in the note as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Parsons, 25685
...239 S.W. 1037, the supreme court of Texas denied a writ of error to the court of civil appeals, which had followed the Texarkana court in Hess v. Denman holding that the statute requiring the owner of the property to execute a bond was unconstitutional, and the declination by that court of ......
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Parsons
...239 S.W. 1037, the supreme court of Texas denied a writ of error to the court of civil appeals, which had followed the Texarkana court in Hess v. Denman holding that the statute requiring the owner of the property to execute a bond was unconstitutional, and the declination by that court of ......
-
Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.
...such bond was given. The Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District considered these statutes in the case of Hess v. Denman Lumber Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 162. In that case the owner failed to require the contractor to give any bond for the performance of his contract. The Denman ......
-
Hartford Accident Indemnity Co v. Nelson Mfg Co
...Hardware Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S.W. 574; cf., however, Gibbs v. Tally, 133 Cal. 373, 65 P. 970, 60 L.R.A. 815; Hess v. Denman Lumber Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S.W. 162, 164. ...