Hewitt v. Hewitt

Decision Date13 April 1938
Docket Number14669.
Citation196 S.E. 541,187 S.C. 86
PartiesHEWITT v. HEWITT et al.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Spartanburg County; T. S Sease, Judge.

Action for construction of title to realty by Claudie Eliza Sims Hewitt against Jacquelyn Ann Hewitt and others, minors under the age of fourteen years. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Arnold R. Merchant, of Spartanburg, for appellants.

C Yates Brown, of Spartanburg, for respondent.

BONHAM Justice.

November 6, 1917, Mrs. L. A. Sims conveyed to her daughter Claudie Eliza Sims a certain storehouse and lot in the city of Spartanburg, S.C. At the time of the conveyance, Claudie Eliza Sims was unmarried, but she has since been married to Adolphus Jack Hewitt, to which union has been born two children, Jacquelyn Ann Hewitt and Adolphus Jack Hewitt, Jr., both under the age of fourteen years. The granting clause of the deed is in these words: "Unto the said Claudie Eliza Sims during the term of her natural life and at her death to the heirs of her body in fee simple."

The habendum clause is in these words: "Unto the said Claudie Eliza Sims for and during the term of her natural life and at her death to the heirs of her body and to their heirs and assigns forever." Subject to the use of the property by Mrs. L. A. Sims, the grantor, for and during her natural life. Mrs. L. A. Sims has since died. Mrs. Hewitt resides at Waynesville, N. C.

The property, which has been rented, has fallen into disrepair, and the tenants will vacate it unless it is repaired. There have accumulated something more than $600 of unpaid taxes on the property, and the tax collector threatens to advertise and sell the property, unless the taxes are paid. Negotiations for a loan were opened with the First Federal Savings & Loan Company, which expressed its willingness to make the loan in an amount sufficient to make the needed repairs and to pay the past-due taxes, if the title to the property was approved by the attorneys of the company. Thereupon this action was brought to obtain the construction of the title by the court. The matter was referred to the master for Spartanburg county to take the testimony and report his findings of fact and conclusions of law. There is no contest over the facts as found by him, which findings are in accord with the facts hereinabove referred to.

He concluded, as a matter of law, that Claudie Eliza Sims Hewitt "is the owner of a fee conditional title to the property, and that since she is the mother of two...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Sims v. Clayton
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1940
    ...541, 542, answers appellant's contention with reference to the effect of the superadded words in the habendum clause here. That clause in the Hewitt case reads: "Unto the Claudie Eliza Sims for and during the term of her natural life and at her death to the heirs of her body and to their he......
  • Smith v. Hanna
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1949
    ...a full discussion of which will be found in 114 A.L.R. page 602. See also Miller v. Graham, 47 S.C. 288, 25 S.E. 165; Hewitt v. Hewitt, 187 S.C. 86, 196 S.E. 541. further contend that a fee conditional estate can arise out of a conveyance such as the one in question only where children are ......
  • Page v. Lewis
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 17, 1946
    ...simple without qualification, and the estate thus granted could not be cut down by subsequent language found in the deeds. Hewitt v. Hewitt, 187 S.C. 86, 196 S.E. 541. Yet cannot escape the conviction that when the language of these deeds is considered in its entirety it was manifestly the ......
  • Blume v. Pearcy
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1944
    ...Carolina, most recently made famous again by our late great Chief Justice Milledge L. Bonham, who wrote the opinion of the Court in Hewitt v. Hewitt, supra. also in the consideration of the appeal has been reference to Volume 1 of the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law of Prope......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT