Hiatt v. Fraternal Home
Decision Date | 17 February 1903 |
Citation | 72 S.W. 463,99 Mo. App. 105 |
Parties | HIATT v. FRATERNAL HOME. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Greene county; Jas. T. Neville, Judge.
Action by Ellen O. Hiatt against the Fraternal Home. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The defendant is a fraternal beneficiary society organized under article 11, c. 12, Rev. St. 1899. The order has a lodge system, with supreme and subordinate lodges, a ritualistic form of lodge work, a secret initiatory ceremony, with signs and passwords, and a representative form of government. Its supreme executive authority is vested in the supreme lodge. This body has a supreme president and a supreme secretary and medical examiner. The principal business office of the order is located at Hamilton, Caldwell county Mo. Foster E. Ackley is, and has been since the organization of the association, its chief medical examiner, and either its actual or acting supreme secretary and its chief manager; in fact, the evidence shows that the executive duties of the supreme lodge have been intrusted wholly to him. Subordinate lodge No. 6 of the order is located at Springfield, Mo. On July 23, 1900, William Hiatt made application for membership in the order, and applied for $2,000 insurance on his life for the benefit of his mother, Ellen O. Hiatt, of Lexington, Ky. He was examined by the local physician of the order at Springfield, and on July 31, 1900, was duly elected to become a member by local lodge No. 6. His application for insurance and his medical examination were forwarded to the home office, and were approved by Dr. Ackley, and the following certificate issued and forwarded to George Ragsdale, secretary of local lodge No. 6, at Springfield, to wit:
Ragsdale was confined to his home at the time by illness, and a secretary pro tem. (J. J. Hibler) was elected to act in his stead during his illness. Ragsdale, however, retained possession of the certificate. By-law No. 69 of the order, after prescribing the manner for making application for insurance and requiring a medical examination to be had, provides as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Supreme Temple of Pythian Sisters v. Cook
... ... 630, ... l. c. 631; Lodge No. 19, Svete Ime Isusovo (Lodge No. 19, ... Croation Fraternal Union of America) v. Svi Sveti (Lodge ... No. 1, Croation Fraternal Union of America), et al ... Mo. 32, 34 S.W. 1096; Whitehead v. Farmers' ... Mutual, 65 S.W.2d 65; Shafer v. Home Co., 227 ... Mo.App. 347, 52 S.W.2d 462; Fletcher's Cyclopedia on ... Corporations, secs. 1526, ... exemplified by the following authorities: 7 C. J. , ... 1091-1092; 14A. C. J. 97; Hiatt v. Fraternal Home, ... 99 Mo.App. 105, 72 S.W. 463; Draffron v. Modern ... Woodmen, 190 ... ...
-
Wintergerst v. Court of Honor
... ... Burnham v. Casualty Co. 117 Mich. 142; Martinson ... v. Ins. Co., 64 Mich. 362; Home Ins. Co. v ... Kennedy, 47 Neb. 138; Georgia Home Ins. Co. v ... Moriarity, 37 S.W. 628. (6) ... Camp, 76 Mo.App. 573; Watkins v. Supreme Lodge, ... 82 Tex. 301; Steele v. Fraternal, Etc., 74 N.E. 122 ... (Ill.). (4) Furnishing blanks for proofs of death, at the ... request of ... ...
-
Fisher v. Supreme Lodge Knights and Ladies of Honor
... ... Ga. 429. (3) The statutes of this State, providing for the ... creation of fraternal beneficiary associations, require them ... to have a lodge system with ritualistic forms of work, ... Schartle v. Modern Brotherhood, 139 Mo.App. 433; ... Sloan v. Loyal, 139 Mo.App. 443; Hiatt v ... Fraternal, 99 Mo.App. 105; Loyd v. Modern ... Woodmen, 113 Mo.App. 20. (4) Where the laws ... Globe Acc. Ins. Co. v. Reid, 19 Ind.App. 203; ... Sommers v. Kansas, 42 Kas. 619; Home Mut. v ... Reil (Pa.), 17 A. 36; Fulton v. Metropolitan, ... 19 N.Y.S. 470; Prudential v ... ...
-
State ex rel. Pythian Sisters v. Cook
...to complain thereof in equity are further exemplified by the following authorities: 7 C.J., 1091-1092; 14A.C.J. 97; Hiatt v. Fraternal Home, 99 Mo. App. 105, 72 S.W. 463; Draffron v. Modern Woodmen, 190 Mo. App. 303, 176 S.W. 498. (3) There is no question here of property rights, and if suc......