Hiatt v. Vaughn, 82-70
| Decision Date | 04 May 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-70,82-70 |
| Citation | 430 So.2d 597 |
| Parties | John L. HIATT, Appellant, v. Bennet H. VAUGHN and Sign Craft, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert M. Gross of Moyle, Jones & Flanigan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Jones & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
This is an appeal from a final judgment dismissing Plaintiff's second amended complaint. We reverse.
The second amended complaint was in four counts, however only the first two counts were preserved for appeal. 1 Plaintiff sought damages for breach of an oral employment contract for two years and for quantum meruit respectively. The second amended complaint alleged the parol nature and terms of the agreement, the aforesaid two year period and full performance by the Plaintiff. The motion to dismiss set forth the defense of the Statute of Frauds, F.S. 725.01. 2
The sole issue before this Court is whether complete performance by an employee of an oral contract of employment, which by its very terms cannot be performed within one year, removes the otherwise barred contract from the operation of the statute of frauds. We hold in the affirmative. See Venditti--Siravo v. City of Hollywood, 418 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1982); Gerry v. Antonio, 409 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1982); W.B.D. Inc. v. Howard Johnson, Co., 382 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 1st D.C.A.1980).
This decision comports with the generally accepted and better reasoned view throughout the United States. 73 Am.Jur.2d 'Statute of Frauds', §§ 533, 534. See also the annotation entitled "Statute of Frauds--Performance" in 6 A.L.R.2d 1053 wherein it stated at page 1111:
"It has been generally, though not universally, held or recognized that complete performance by one party of an oral contract not to be performed within a year takes the contract out of the Statute of Frauds."
The judgment appealed from is reversed and remanded to the trial court.
1 Count IV, which stated a claim based on violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act was voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff. Plaintiff did not challenge the dismissal of Count III, nor did Plaintiff challenge the dismissal of Count II as it applied to the Defendant, Bennet H. Vaughn.
2 Defendant, Appellee concedes that a claim for quantum meruit is not subject to the statute of frauds.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Collier v. Brooks
...Inc., 611 So.2d 1316, 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); AV-MED, Inc. v. French, 458 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Hiatt v. Vaughn, 430 So.2d 597, 598 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Venditti-Siravo v. City of Hollywood, 418 So.2d 1251, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Gerry v. Antonio, 409 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. ......
-
Eclipse Medical v. American Hydro-Surgical
...at equity when the relief sought was specific performance in the form of payment due under the oral agreement. See Watt v. Vaughn, 430 So.2d 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)(employment contract); Venditti-Siravo, Inc. v. Hollywood, 418 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)(agreement to pay taxes); Gerry v.......
-
Neva, Inc. v. Christian Duplications Intern., Inc.
...See, e.g., Elliott v. Timmons, 519 So.2d 671, 672 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.), rev. denied, 525 So.2d 878 (Fla.1988); Hiatt v. Vaughn, 430 So.2d 597, 598 (Fla.Dist.Ct. App.1983). The Episcopal Foundation argues that there is no basis for the $172,000 breach of contract damages received by Plaintiffs......
-
Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc., 91-3777
...(Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 117 (Fla.1985); AV-MED, Inc. v. French, 458 So.2d 67, 69 (Fla. 3d DCA1984); Hiatt v. Vaughn, 430 So.2d 597, 598 (Fla. 4th DCA1983); Dionne v. Columbus Mills, Inc., 311 So.2d 681, 683 (Fla. 2d DCA1975); Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank v. Shalleck, 182 So.......