Hickory Novelty Co. v. Andrews
Decision Date | 21 June 1924 |
Docket Number | 474. |
Citation | 123 S.E. 314,188 N.C. 59 |
Parties | HICKORY NOVELTY CO. v. ANDREWS. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Catawba County; Webb, Judge.
Action by the Hickory Novelty Company against D. W. Andrews. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
The facts material are:
The plaintiff is a corporation doing business in Hickory, N. C prior to and since January 1, 1920. The defendant is a citizen of Durham, N. C., residing there prior to and since January 1, 1920. On January 3, 1920, and prior thereto, C. W Andrews & Bros. were doing business in Durham, N. C., and in connection with their business purchased lumber, boxes, and other lumber products, and also sold to the trade such products. The Hickory Novelty Company deals in lumber of various kinds, manufacturing moulding and other wood products for the trade.
The defendant, in answer says:
"The defendant admits that C. W. Andrews and two of his other sons, under the firm name of C. W. Andrews & Bros., had been doing business with plaintiff and Hutton & Bourbonnais Company prior to January 3, 1920, and had become indebted to plaintiff and said company in the sum of $3,509.68, and did write the firm of Hutton & Bourbonnais a letter under date of January 3, 1920."
The letter is as follows:
The Home Savings Bank letter inclosed, is as follows:
The plaintiff further contends:
"That after said letter of credit or guaranty of D. W. Andrews, along with a letter of the Home Savings Bank of Durham, N. C., was received by plaintiff and the Hutton & Bourbonnais Company, the said firm of C. W. Andrews & Bros. continued to do business with plaintiff during the remainder of the year 1920, and continued on through 1921, and for a portion of the year 1922." That about June 10, 1922, the firm of C. W. Andrews & Bros owed plaintiff a balance of $3,924.12 and interest.
The total sales of goods to C. W. Andrews & Bros., after the letter of January 3, 1920, of D. W. Andrews, was $15,939.89, which, with credits, left on June 10, 1922, above amount ($3,924.12) due. A. B. Hutton testified that the amount of the old account mentioned in D. W. Andrews' letter, of $3,509.68, had been paid. The record shows that A. B. Hutton was interested in the plaintiff, Hickory Novelty Company, and was acting for plaintiff. The amount sued on has never been questioned as being inaccurate, as far as the amount is concerned. C. W. Andrews & Bros. delayed making payment, and plaintiff wrote D. W. Andrews, reminding him of his obligation.
On July 21, 1922, D. W. Andrews wrote from Durham, N. C., the following letter to A. B. Hutton, at Hickory, N. C.:
On July 1st a check for $500 was paid on the account by C. W. Andrews & Bros., and on August 5th a check for $250 was paid on the account, reducing the indebtedness to $3,174.12 and interest.
On August 1, 1922, A. B. Hutton wrote to D. W. Andrews a letter to Durham, N. C., as follows:
The defendant contends that the firm copartnership doing business under the name of C. W. Andrews & Bros. was dissolved on February 1, 1921; that C. W. Andrews, being chief stockholder, and several of his brothers, with D. W. Andrews, organized a corporation as C. W. Andrews & Bros., Inc., and the corporation is due the sum contended for by plaintiff, and not the defendant, and that the corporation, at the time of the institution of this suit, was in the hands of a receiver, and has since been put into bankruptcy; that he never guaranteed to plaintiff "any indebtedness due it by said corporation, and is advised, believes, and alleges that the letter written by him on January 3, 1920, does not in any way make him responsible for the debts or obligations of said corporation."
The articles of incorporation were filed in the office of the Secretary of State January 29, 1921, and in the clerk's office at Durham, N. C., February 9, 1921. C. W. Andrews & Bros., and the corporation formed, have become insolvent. It was admitted that the entire account is filed in the bankruptcy proceeding against C. W. Andrews & Bros., Inc.
C. H. Cline, secretary of Hickory Novelty Company, and bookkeeper and office man, testified:
D. W. Andrews, testified in part:
"After I wrote that letter to the head of the Hutton & Bourdonnais Company I never received any reply. I have been...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spartan Leasing Inc. v. Pollard
...pay all sums due and to become due to you from [Pollard]. This guaranty by its terms is a continuing guaranty. See Novelty Co. v. Andrews, 188 N.C. 59, 123 S.E. 314 (1924); Amoco Oil Co. v. Griffin, 78 N.C.App. 716, 338 S.E.2d 601, disc. review denied, 316 N.C. 374, 342 S.E.2d 889 (1986). I......
-
Balentine v. Gill
... ... him lawfully authorized. C.S. § 987; Hickory Novelty Co ... v. Andrews, 188 N.C. 59, 123 S.E. 314 ... So far ... as Gill ... ...
-
O'Grady v. First Union Nat. Bank
...is specific, a guaranty which covers a series of extensions of credit or a succession of transactions is continuing. Novelty Co. v. Andrews, 188 N.C. 59, 123 S.E. 314 (1924). See Simpson on Suretyship, § 6 (1950); Lee, N.C. Law of Suretyship, § 2 (5th Ed. Though a special law of guaranty ha......
-
Cities Service Oil Co. v. Howell Oil Co., Inc.
...express provisions of the 1966 guaranty agreement and according to the definition of a continuing guaranty in Hickory Novelty Company v. Andrews, 188 N.C. 59, 123 S.E. 314 (1924), the 1966 agreement was a continuing guaranty. The agreement itself states "this is a continuing guarantee apply......