Hickox v. Wilson, S98A0005
| Decision Date | 09 March 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. S98A0005,S98A0005 |
| Citation | 269 Ga. 180,496 S.E.2d 711 |
| Parties | , 98 FCDR 814 HICKOX v. WILSON et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Douglas L. Gibson, Gibson & Spivey, P.C., Waycross, for Jean H. Hickox.
William J. Edgar, Solomon & Edgar, Alma, for Joe Wilson.
Jean Hickox filed a petition to probate in solemn form, the last will and testament of her step-mother, Daisy Howard. A caveat was filed by the testatrix's nieces and nephews, her heirs at law, on the ground that the purported will was not signed by the testatrix and is invalid. After the probate court admitted the will to record, the caveators appealed to the superior court where they were awarded summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.
One month before her death, testatrix asked her friend Mildred Kerr to witness the signing of her will. Kerr informed testatrix that she believed two witnesses and a notary public are required, and they arranged for another witness and a notary to join them. Kerr's affidavit testimony shows: The second witness, Delima Mealling, also averred that testatrix "signed her name" in the presence of the two witnesses and the notary.
The instrument consists of three pages, printed in the same type style, and stapled together. Pages one and two relate to the disposition of testatrix's estate; the third page consists of a self-proving affidavit. See OCGA § 53-2-40.1. Kerr and Mealling signed page two in their capacity as witnesses, and Howell signed that page as notary on the line intended for the testatrix's signature. Although the testatrix failed to sign page two, the third page--the self-proving affidavit--bears her signature above the line designated for "testator." This affidavit establishes that Daisy W. Howard declared in the presence of the notary and two witnesses that the "foregoing instrument" was intended as her last will and testament. The signatures of Kerr and Mealling also appear on page three as witnesses, along with Howell's notarization.
We have long followed the principle that:
The will with which the law deals is to be sought for and to be found in the mind and intention of the testatrix. The writing is but the evidence of that intention. It is to the oneness, sufficiency and completeness of the testamentary intent...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Miles v. Bryant, No. S03A1258.
...455; Ellis v. O'Neal, 175 Ga. 652, 165 S.E. 751 (1932). 13. 41 Ga. 696 (1871). 14. 227 Ga. 560, 181 S.E.2d 837 (1971). 15. 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998); see also Westmoreland v. Tallent, 274 Ga. 172, 174-175, 549 S.E.2d 113 (2001) ("self-proving affidavit is part of the will and a tes......
-
Singelman v. Singelmann
...propounder and caveator. The court characterized the will offered by Singelmann as self-proving.3 See OCGA § 53-4-24; Hickox v. Wilson, 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998). When a will is self-proved, it "may be admitted to probate without the testimony of any subscribing witness." OCGA § 53......
-
Westmoreland v. Tallent, S01A0337.
...is part of the will and a testatrix's signature solely on the affidavit constitutes a signature on the will. Hickox v. Wilson, 269 Ga. 180, 181, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998). The self-proving affidavit serves a unique function in the probate of wills because it has the effect of permitting probate......
- Int'l Auto Logistics, LLC v. Vehicle Processing Ctr. of Fayetteville, Inc.
-
Wills, Trusts, Guardianships, and Fiduciary Administration - Mary F. Radford
...refused to invalidate a will merely because the execution and attestation requirements were not strictly followed. In Hickox v. Wilson, 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998), the will comprised two pages, which ended with lines for the testator's and witnesses' signatures. A self-proving affid......
-
Wills, Trusts, and Administration of Estates - James C. Rehberg
...at 896, 497 S.E.2d at 613. 96. O.C.G.A. Sec. 29-2-52(b) (1997). 97. 230 Ga. App. at 896, 497 S.E.2d at 613. 98. Id. 99. Id. 100. Id. 101. 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998). 102. Id. at 180, 496 S.E.2d at 711-12. 103. Id., 496 S.E.2d at 712. 104. O.C.G.A. Sec. 53-2-40.1 (1997). 105. 269 Ga.......
-
Significant trends in the trust law of the United States.
...CODE [sections] 2-503; Will of Ranney, 589 A.2d 1339 (N.J. 1991); Faith v. Singleton, 692 S.W.2d 239 (Ark. 1985). Cf. Hickox v. Wilson, 496 S.E.2d 711 (Ga. 1998). See also RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF PROPERTY: DONATIVE TRANSFERS [sections] 3.3 (1999); John Langbein, Excusing Harmless Error in Ex......