Highlands Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin
| Decision Date | 03 September 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 52118,52118 |
| Citation | 387 So.2d 118 |
| Parties | HIGHLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY and Amco Underwriters v. Mrs. Jean Davis McLAUGHLIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Ralph E.McLaughlin, Deceased. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Watkins & Eager, James L. Carroll, Virginia T. Munford, Jackson, for appellants.
Cain, Cain & Ritchey, J. M. Ritchey, Canton, for appellee.
Before ROBERTSON, WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.
Highlands Insurance Company and Amco Underwriters appeal from a judgment for $8,507.77 rendered against them and in favor of Jean Davis McLaughlin, Administratrix of the Estate of Ralph E. McLaughlin, deceased, by the Circuit Court of Madison County, sitting without a jury.
Highlands, through Amco, issued a fire and extended coverage insurance policy to Charlie Gray Auto Mart, Canton, Mississippi, covering the building occupied by the Auto Mart, and the contents and equipment of the Mart located in the building.
The first page of the policy contained this mortgage clause:
Subject to the provisions of the mortgage clause attached hereto, loss, if any, on building items, shall be payable to :
Ralph McLaughlin
710 East Kathy Circle
Canton, MS 39046
(Emphasis added).
The auto repair shop was damaged by fire on November 18, 1977. The building sustained damages of $8,507.77, and the contents and equipment damages of $4,647.
A draft was issued by Highlands for $13,154.77, the total of damages to the building and contents, which draft was made payable to Charlie Gray and Ralph McLaughlin. McLaughlin refused to endorse the draft and called on Noble and Fortenberry, Inc., soliciting agents for Highlands, to issue a separate draft for the damages to the building only. Highlands then issued its draft payable to Charlie Gray Auto Mart for damages to the contents only, and a separate draft for $8,507.77 for damages to the building only, which draft recited: "Upon acceptance pay Charlie Gray Auto Mart; Ralph McLaughlin". This draft was delivered to Charlie Gray. He erased Ralph McLaughlin's name as joint payee, endorsed the draft "Charlie Gray Auto Mart," cashed it, and used the entire proceeds for Charlie Gray only. Ralph McLaughlin never received any part of these proceeds.
When McLaughlin demanded payment from Highlands Insurance Company, Highlands refused to pay, contending that it had made the settlement draft for $8,507.77 payable to both Charlie Gray and Ralph McLaughlin, that the draft had been paid, and McLaughlin should look to Charlie Gray for recovery. McLaughlin then brought suit against Highlands, and, upon his death, the suit proceeded to judgment in the name of Mrs. Jean Davis McLaughlin, Administratrix of the estate of Ralph E. McLaughlin, Deceased.
Appellants assign as error:
I. The trial court erroneously based its judgment upon a finding which was outside the issues as framed by the pleadings and proof below, when it held that Highlands breached its duty to inspect the draft for proper endorsements and thereby was liable to McLaughlin.
II. Moreover, the trial court erred in applying the substantive law by holding that Highlands breached its legal duty toward McLaughlin.
We affirm.
The policy itself, on the first page, provided:
(Emphasis added).
This constituted a separate and independent contract with the mortgagee, McLaughlin, only. National Security Fire and Casualty Co. v. Mid State, 370 So.2d 1351 (Miss.1979).
This mortgage clause was required by this provision of MCA section 83-13-9 (1972):
"Each fire insurance policy on buildings taken out by a mortgagor or grantor in a deed of trust shall have attached or shall contain substantially the following mortgagee clause, viz: Loss or damage, if any, under this policy, shall be payable to (here insert the name of the party), as ____ mortgagee (or trustee), as ____ interest may appear, and this insurance, as to the interest of the mortgagee (or trustee) only therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor . . ." (Emphasis added).
In Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Associates Capital Corp., 313 So.2d 404 (Miss.1975), this Court said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
G&B Invs., Inc. v. Henderson (In re Evans)
...991 So.2d at 1211. “The burden of proving an agency relationship rests squarely upon the party asserting it.” Highlands Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin, 387 So.2d 118, 120 (Miss.1980). Whether an agency relationship exists depends upon whether the parties intended to create an agency relationship, a......
-
Woods v. Nichols, 52684
...it, in this case the plaintiff Nichols. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Arrington, 255 So.2d 652 (Miss.1971); Highlands Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin, 387 So.2d 118 (Miss.1980). It is an elementary principle of law in this State that a mere permissive user of a motor vehicle does not in and of it......
-
McFarland v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
...has stated that "[t]he burden of proving an agency relationship rests squarely upon the party asserting it." Highlands Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin, 387 So.2d 118, 120 (Miss.1980). McFarland failed to meet this burden and since Entergy has no knowledge of this person's identity, there is no proof......
-
Smith v. Industrial Constructors, Inc.
...any payment was due the plaintiff, and therefore that no award of prejudgment interest would be proper. Highlands Insurance Co. v. McLaughlin, 387 So.2d 118, 121 (Miss.1980); Glantz Contracting Co. v. General Electric Co., 379 So.2d 912, 918-19 (Miss.1980). We hold that the district court d......