Hightower v. State
Decision Date | 01 January 1858 |
Citation | 22 Tex. 605 |
Parties | JOSHUA HIGHTOWER v. THE STATE. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
The declarations of a party, jointly indicted with the defendant, are not admissible as evidence against the defendant, when there is no proof of a conspiracy between them.
The defendant's motion for a new trial should have been sustained. The whole testimony, taken together, did not implicate him in any offense, or show that the alleged offense was committed in the county where the indictment was found.
APPEAL from Johnson. Tried below before the Hon. Ed. H. Vontress.
The appellant and William Shelly, S. S. Taylor, J. W. Lynn, M. Shelton and Thomas Hightower, were indicted for the false imprisonment of J. Simons. Upon the trial, C. J. Jaco, a witness for the state, testified,
Profit, a witness for the state, testified, “That Shelly told him, on Tuesday, the seventeenth day of March, and the day after the prisoner was released, they arrested Simons on Sunday, the fifteenth of March, for stealing a hog; that they let him go that evening after taking his gun and knife as security for his return the next day; that Simons went home, and returned the next day; that they let him go the first day, thinking he would run off; that on the second day, Jaco and his party came and released him; that he said they had no warrant.”
Lynn, a witness for defendant, testified, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Cain
...46; Clawson v. State, 14 Ohio St. 234; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 239; Browning v. State, 30 Miss. 656; Jones v. Com., 2 Dev. 48; Hightower v. State, 22 Tex. 605; v. State, 4 Gratt. 547; Sand's case, 21 Gratt. 895; Danville Bank v. Waddill's adm'r., 31 Gratt. 484. The only evidence introduced......
-
State of West Virginia v. Cain.
...46; Clawson v. State, 14 Ohio St. 234; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 239; Browning v. State, 30 Miss. 656; Jones v. Com., 2 Dev. 48; Hightower v. State, 22 Tex. 605; Williamson v. State, 4 Gratt, 547; Sand's case, 21 Graft, 895; Danmlle Bank v. Waddills adm'r., 31 Gratt. 484. The only evidence i......
-
Myers v. State
...of Texas; Russell, Crimes, 800, 801; 3 Greenl. Ev. 15; Scott v. State Texas; Vance v. State Texas; Searcy v. State, 4 Tex. 450;Hightower v. State, 22 Tex. 605;Commonwealth v. Col, 21 Pick. 509. If the above be a correct exposition of the law, then this case must be reversed upon the fifteen......
-
James H. Callihan's Ex'r & Another v. Johnson
...22 Tex. 596JAMES H. CALLIHAN'S EX'R AND ANOTHERv.COLLIN JOHNSON.Supreme Court of Texas.1858 ... The laws of this state interfere as little as possible with the delicate and responsible relation of master and slave. Much is left to the master's judgment, discretion and ... ...