Hiley v. Barrett, 97-9006
| Decision Date | 21 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-9006,97-9006 |
| Citation | 155 F.3d 1276 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 123 William S. HILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jacqueline H. BARRETT, Sheriff, Fulton County, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Robert N. Wilson, Jr., Monahan & Padellaro, Cambridge, MA, Curt Thompson, International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Mark B. Stern, Robert M. Loeb, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, Sharon Douglas Stokes, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:97-CV-276-RCF); Richard C. Freeman, Judge.
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and LENARD *, District Judge.
This case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned order dated July 2, 1997, and cited as 968 F.Supp. 1564 (N.D.Ga.1997).
AFFIRMED.
* Honorable Joan A. Lenard, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis PD.
...National Ass'n of Gov't Employees, Inc. v. Barrett, 968 F. Supp. 1564, 1575-76 (N.D. Ga. 1997), aff'd & adopted by Hiley v. Barrett, 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 1998). The statute simply employs a state conviction as the predicate for a prohibition to engage in an activity over which Congress ......
-
Swartz v. Mathes
...not constitute a violation of the ex post facto clause); NAGE, Inc. v. Barrett, 968 F.Supp. 1564, 1575-76 (N.D.Ga.1997), aff'd 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir.1998), (concluding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) does not criminalize conduct that occurred prior to its effective date). See also United States v. ......
-
Lehman v. Pennsylvania State Police
...F.3d 282 (2d Cir.1994), and Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees v. Barrett, 968 F.Supp. 1564 (N.D.Ga.1997), aff'd sub nom., Hiley v. Barrett, 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir.1998), the Commonwealth Court concluded § 922(g) did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. This ......
-
Lieberman v. MacMaster
...defendant. See Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees, Inc. v. Barrett, 968 F. Supp. 1564, 1570 (N.D. Ga. 1997) aff'd sub nom.; Hiley v. Barrett, 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 1998) (finding that a deputy sheriff who was terminated after the passage of the Lautenberg Amendment had standing to challenge ......
-
Examining the Lautenberg Amendment in the civilian and military contexts: congressional overreaching, statutory vagueness, ex post facto violations, and implementational flaws.
...(40.) E.g., Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees, Inc. v. Barrett, 968 F. Supp. 1564, 1572 (N.D. Ga. 1997), aff'd sub. nom Hiley v. Barrett, 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 1998); Fraternal Order of Police v. United States, 981 F. Supp. 1, 4 (D.D.C. (41.) E.g., Barrett, 968 F. Supp. at 1572; Fraternal O......
-
Goodbye Earl: Domestic Abusers and Guns in the Wake of United States v. Castleman-can the Supreme Court Save Domestic Violence Victims?
...Congress' power under the Commerce Clause."); Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Emp., Inc. v. Barrett, 968 F. Supp. 1564, 1572 (N.D. Ga. 1997), aff'd, 155 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 1998) (stating that § 922(g)(9) contains a jurisdictional element that provides the requisite nexus between interstate commerce ......