Hill Mercantile Co. v. Rotan Grocery Co.
Decision Date | 23 March 1910 |
Parties | HILL MERCANTILE CO. et al. v. ROTAN GROCERY CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; Marshall Surratt, Judge.
Action by the Rotan Grocery Company against the Hill Mercantile Company and others. From the judgment, certain of defendants appeal. Reformed and affirmed.
Odell & Johnson, W. Poindexter, and S. C. Padelford, for appellants. Prendergast & Williamson, for appellee.
The Rotan Grocery Company instituted this suit against the Hill Mercantile Company on certain notes and an account, amounting in the aggregate to $10,850.12. R. N. Hill, J. N. Smith, and J. A. Hill were also made parties defendant, the plaintiff seeking to recover against them on a guaranty for the sum of $7,000, with interest and attorney's fees thereon. The defendants filed a general denial, and the defendant J. A. Hill filed a special plea, alleging, in substance, that the written guaranty sued on was not binding upon him, for the reason that he signed it upon an agreement to the effect that the signature of one Jake Nelson was to be procured in order to render it binding on him J. A. Hill. After hearing all the evidence, the trial court instructed a verdict for the plaintiff against the Hill Mercantile Company for $10,850.12, and against the other defendants as guarantors for the sum of $8,683.88. A verdict was returned as instructed, and judgment rendered in accordance therewith, and the defendants J. A. Hill and R. N. Hill have appealed.
Under several assignments of error, properly presented in appellants' brief, it is contended that the court below committed error in directing and compelling the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff upon the guaranty for the following reasons: First, because the proof shows that J. A. Hill signed the guaranty upon condition that Jake Nelson should also sign it, of which appellee had notice, and that as Jake Nelson did not sign it, he, J. A. Hill, is not bound thereby; second, that J. A. Hill was not notified of the acceptance of the guaranty by appellee, hence is not bound thereby; third, that the guaranty is not a continuing one, and, as the debts which were owing at the time the guaranty was made have been paid, the guarantors are released; fourth, that because appellee took collateral security, other than the guaranty, it thereby waived any right to enforce the guaranty, and, if such right was not waived, the judgment should be arrested because it does not dispose of the collaterals; and, fifth, that by the terms of the contract of guaranty the liability of the guarantors is limited to $7,000, and error was committed in holding them liable in excess of that sum.
The undisputed testimony shows that on the 22d of March, 1906, the Hill Mercantile Company was a private corporation, and was indebted to the Rotan Grocery Company, another private corporation, about $6,200, the most of which was represented by notes executed by the Hill Mercantile Company alone, and that on that day the Rotan Grocery Company sent the following letter to the Hill Mercantile Company:
Attached to that letter and accompanying the same was a printed form of guaranty, and the letter and the unsigned guaranty were received by R. N. Hill who signed his name and the name of J. N. Smith thereto. He also carried it to J. A. Hill and he signed it, and R. N. Hill then returned it to the Rotan Grocery Company, together with a letter reading as follows:
The guaranty reads as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McClintock v. Ayers
... ... Potter, 63 Mo. 212; Dair v ... U.S. 21 L.Ed. 491; Hill Co. v. Grocery Co., ... (Tex.) 127 S.W. 1080; State v. Lewis, (N. C.) ... ...
-
Gimbel Brothers v. Mitchell
... ... contract, the construction should be in favor of the surety ... Hill Mercantile Co. v. Rotan Grocery Co. (Texas), ... 127 S.W. 1080; Kansas ... ...
-
Colonial American Cas. and Sur. v. Scherer
...Sur. Corp., 869 S.W.2d at 650, 653 (awarding $11,968.74 in attorney's fees against each of two $13,000 bonds); Hill Mercantile Co. v. Rotan Grocery Co., 127 S.W. 1080, 1082 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1910, no writ) (contracts of suretyship to be strictly construed, and even when surety agreed to ......
-
Goeke v. Merchants Nat. Bank and Trust Co. of Indianapolis, 1-883A271
... ... Dana, 6 Hill, 543, a case parallel with the present: "But here the undertaking was ... Kirkpatrick, (M.D.Tenn.1964) 234 F.Supp. 537. Hill Mercantile Co. et al. v. Rotan Grocery Co., (1910) Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W. 1080 holds ... ...