Hill v. Arnold
Decision Date | 25 May 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 17092.,17092. |
Parties | HILL et al. v. ARNOLD et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Guy D. Kirby, Judge.
Action by Margaret M. Hill and others against Mary G. Arnold and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
This is a suit in ejectment to recover the possession of the following described property: Commencing 971/3 poles north of the southeast corner of the S. W. ¼ of section 14, township 29, range 22; thence west 12 poles; thence north 131/3 poles; thence east 12 poles; thence south 131/3 poles to the beginning, excepting and reserving a strip of ground 3% rods in width across the north side and a strip of ground 40 feet in width across the south side thereof, situate in the city of Springfield, Greene county, Mo. Trial was had in the circuit court of Greene county, Mo., resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendants have duly perfected an appeal to this court.
Henry Caldwell is the common source of title. The evidence concerning plaintiffs' paper title was substantially as follows: July 5, 1889, said Caldwell executed a deed of trust on this property to secure a note for $154.50. John L. Mooney was the beneficiary in this deed of trust. Said deed of trust was foreclosed by sale by the trustee in said deed of trust on the 9th day of June, 1892. Maria C. Mooney became the purchaser of the property at the trustee's sale for the sum of $350, and the trustee made a deed to her, conveying the premises, on the 27th day of May, 1893. Later said Maria C. Mooney died testate, and by the terms of her will, which was probated on January 13, 1906, all of her real estate was devised to John L. Mooney. Said John L. Mooney died about four years prior to the institution of this suit, and the plaintiffs herein are his only heirs at law.
The evidence concerning defendants' paper title was substantially as follows: On February 14, 1883, said Caldwell, the common source of title, executed a deed of trust on this property to secure a note in the sum of $35 made payable to F. T. Mills. This deed of trust was never foreclosed, but appears to have been canceled by a decree entered in the circuit court of Greene county, Mo., May 18, 1889, in a suit wherein Henry Caldwell was plaintiff and F. T. Mills, Mahala C. Wright, and C. C. Wright were defendants. The decree in that case is in words and figures as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rosenzweig v. Ferguson
...and never has been. Execution to enforce an expired lien was therefore an order to enforce a nullity. Wolz v. Venard, 253 Mo. 67; Hill v. Arnold, 177 S.W. 343; Christy v. McKee, 94 Mo. 241; Bank v. Wells, 12 Mo. 361; Durrett v. Hulse, 67 Mo. 201; Wise v. Darby, 9 Mo. 132; Beedle v. Mead, 81......
-
Rosenzweig v. Ferguson
... ... v. Muench, 217 Mo. 124; ... Wilson v. Reid, 270 Mo. 400; Irwin v ... Burgan, 28 S.W.2d 1017; Miller v. Connor, 177 ... Mo.App. 630; Hill v. St. Louis, 20 Mo. 581; Ball ... v. Peper, 141 Mo.App. 26; St. Louis v. Crow, ... 171 Mo. 272; State ex rel. v. Mulloy, 15 S.W.2d 809 ... (6) ... Execution to enforce an expired lien was ... therefore an order to enforce a nullity. Wolz v ... Venard, 253 Mo. 67; Hill v. Arnold, 177 S.W ... 343; Christy v. McKee, 94 Mo. 241; Bank v ... Wells, 12 Mo. 361; Durrett v. Hulse, 67 Mo ... 201; Wise v. Darby, 9 Mo. 132; Beedle ... ...
-
Woods v. Wilson
...lien of the judgment against the Wilsons had ceased to be alive and effective when Minnie Wilson acquired the land in question. Hill v. Arnold (Mo.), 177 S.W. 343, is pertinent here. Headnote 1 in the Southwestern reflects the substance of the ruling there made, which headnote is as follows......
-
Woods v. Wilson, 34652.
...judgment against the Wilsons had ceased to be alive and effective when Minnie Wilson acquired the land in question. Hill v. Arnold (Mo.), 177 S.W. 343, is somewhat pertinent here. Headnote 1 in the Southwestern reflects the substance of the ruling there made, which headnote is as follows: "......