Hill v. Hill

Decision Date04 April 1921
Docket Number9805.
Citation70 Colo. 47,197 P. 236
PartiesHILL v. HILL.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Error to County Court, City and County of Denver; Ira C Rothgerber, Judge.

Action by Jessie E. Hill against Richard T. Hill. From an order awarding plaintiff temporary alimony, defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

H. R Kaus, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Wayne A. Gunkle and Ralph E. C. Kerwin, both of Denver, for defendant in error.

WHITFORD J.

The defendant in error filed her petition for temporary alimony court costs, and attorney fees in the divorce action instituted by her against the plaintiff in error, wherein she charged him with statutory cruelty.

On the hearing of the petition the plaintiff in error set up as a defense and introduced in evidence the following document which is denominated a property settlement, signed by the defendant in error and formally acknowledged by her before a notary public, to wit:

'Know all men by these presents, that I, Jessie E. Hill (also known as Jessie May Hill), of the city and county of Denver, Colorado, in consideration of the sum of seven hundred dollars ($700) to me in hand paid by my husband, Richard T. Hill, of the same place, the receipt of which is hereby confessed and acknowledged, do hereby accept the same in full settlement of all claims of whatsoever kind which I have or might have against the said Richard T. Hill for support and maintenance as his wife, and for my interest in and to any property, real, personal or mixed, which he now owns, or may become owner of, and for all claims for alimony, if we should become divorced and I hereby release the said Richard T. Hill of that certain obligation contained in those certain articles of separation and the agreement therein, made and entered into under date of May 28, 1919, between Richard T. Hill and Jessie E. Hill, whereby during the life of said agreement the said Richard T. Hill is obligated to pay me the sum of forty dollars ($40) per month for my support.

'It is my purpose and intention hereby to release all claim whatsoever which I have or might have in any property, real, personal or mixed, now owned by my said husband, or standing in his name, or which he may hereafter acquire, and to release my said husband of and from any and all obligations for maintenance and support and alimony, and the payment of forty dollars ($40) per month provided in our said articles of separation.'

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Marriage of Manzo, In re
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 28 Febrero 1983
    ...Wigner relied on cases which pre-dated the adoption of section 14-10-112--Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 Colo. 190, 210 P. 398 (1922), Hill v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 197 P. 236 (1921), and Daniels v. Daniels, 9 Colo. 133, 10 P. 657 (1886)--and which were decided at a time when separation agreements were no......
  • Brimble v. Sickler
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 27 Febrero 1928
    ... ... [83 ... Colo. 504] Concerning contracts between husband and wife, Mr ... Justice Whitford said in Hill v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 49, 197 ... P. 236, 237: ... 'In ... contracts of this nature it must be made to appear that the ... husband has ... ...
  • Marriage of Wigner, In re
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 1 Diciembre 1977
    ...unconscionable any agreement that is not "fair, reasonable and just." See Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 Colo. 190, 210 P. 398 (1922); Hill v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 197 P. 236 (1921); Daniels v. Daniels, 9 Colo. 133, 10 P. 657 (1886). To protect litigants from decisions made at this stage of dissolution p......
  • Hobbs v. Hobbs
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 6 Noviembre 1922
    ... ... inconsistent therewith. On principle and on the authorities ... above cited, plaintiff's proposition is not tenable ... In Hill ... v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 197 P. 236, this court said: ... 'In ... contracts of this nature it must be made to appear that the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • ARTICLE 10
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association C.R.S. on Family and Juvenile Law (2022 ed.) (CBA) Title 14 Domestic Matters
    • Invalid date
    ...of this nature it must be made to appear that the husband has dealt fairly and equitable with his wife in the transaction. Hill v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 197 P. 236 (1921); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 Colo. 190, 210 P. 398 (1922). Parents may not by agreement divest the court of continuing jurisdiction ......
  • ARTICLE 10 UNIFORM DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ACT
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association C.R.S. on Family and Juvenile Law (CBA) Title 14 Domestic Matters
    • Invalid date
    ...of this nature it must be made to appear that the husband has dealt fairly and equitable with his wife in the transaction. Hill v. Hill, 70 Colo. 47, 197 P. 236 (1921); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 Colo. 190, 210 P. 398 (1922). Parents may not by agreement divest the court of continuing jurisdiction ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT