Hill v. Holloway
| Citation | 3 N.W. 722,52 Iowa 678 |
| Parties | HILL ET AL v. HOLLOWAY |
| Decision Date | 13 December 1879 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Iowa |
Appeal from Webster Circuit Court.
Motion to strike from abstract and transcript sustained.
The appellee in this case moves that the evidence be stricken from the transcript and from the abstract upon the alleged ground that the evidence is not identified, certified or preserved by a bill of exceptions. The only reference in the bill of exceptions to the evidence is as follows: "That on the trial of said cause the following was the entire evidence in said cause and the rulings of the court on the same, and the rulings of the court on all the evidence, which evidence, rulings of the court, exceptions, and all the rulings of the court on the evidence are as follows, viz (Here let the clerk insert all the evidence, rulings objections and exceptions.") This is simply a general direction to the clerk to insert all the evidence in the case. The judge settling and signing the bill of exceptions does not determine what is the evidence which was introduced upon the trial, and is to be incorporated in the bill of exceptions, but leaves that question entirely to the determination of the clerk. The bill of exceptions does not indicate any source from which the clerk shall derive information upon the subject. Whether he shall determine the evidence from notes kept by the judge, or from notes of the official reporter, or from depositions on file, or from his own recollection, or from all these and other sources combined, the bill of exceptions is entirely silent. It is apparent that very great abuses might follow such a practice, if it should be allowed and become general. The testimony should be so unmistakably identified, as to render it certain what is to be incorporated into the transcript and become a part of the record, without leaving anything to the determination of the clerk or the parties. It is the business of the court to determine with precision what shall be made a part of the record. It must not be left to inference, or to be established by evidence outside of the record.
When the testimony is taken by deposition, or is preserved by the official short hand reporter, it is not necessary that the depositions or the reporter's notes should be copied in full in the bill of exceptions, before it receives the judge's signature, but in such case they should be referred to as part...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lommen v. Tobiason
...time the notes came into the defendant's hands in the other case. But the record does not furnish any data for the determination of the [3 N.W. 722] amount of that interest. Whilst it is probable that the foregoing results fail to do full justice to the plaintiffs, yet, in our opinion, they......
- Hill v. Holloway