Hill v. Moore
Decision Date | 14 November 1908 |
Citation | 113 S.W. 788,121 Tenn. 182 |
Parties | HILL et al. v. MOORE et al. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Jefferson County; Hal. H. Haynes Chancellor.
Action by L. C. Hill and others against J. L. Moore and others. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
C. T Rankin, for appellants.
Swan & Cawood, for appellees.
This action was brought in the chancery court of Jefferson county to recover a part of a 15-acre tract of land described in the pleadings. The complainant deraigned a complete title from the state. The defendants, however, insist that one link in the chain of title, consisting of a clerk and master's deed, is defective, because that deed is not supported by the record of the cause in which the land was sold; hence that within the rule laid down in Castleman v. Land Co., 1 Tenn. Ch. App. 9, 12, 13, the complainant cannot recover. The case stated does fall within the authority cited, and the point would be fatal to the recovery, but for the fact that the rule referred to is met by Acts 1907, p 1131, c. 334. This act reads as follows:
The deed referred to, so far as necessary to be quoted, reads as follows:
"This indenture, made this the 21st day of January, A. D. 1902, between G. W. Holtsinger, clerk and master of the chancery court at Dandridge, for Jefferson county, Tennessee, of the first part, and J. H. Ferguson, of Jefferson county, state of Tennessee, of the second part, witnesseth that by a decree of said court, rendered at the May term, 1899, in the cause of J. H. Carey, Adm'r, et al., complainants, v. J. L. Kirby et al., defendants, and entered on page 567 of Minute Book 11, the said clerk and master did, on the 14th day of November, 1899, sell at public auction...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Williams
... ... copy of the record, in order to overturn the prima facie case ... made by the deed. Hill v. Moore, 121 Tenn. 182, 113 ... S.W. 788; Camp v. Riddle, 128 Tenn. 294, 160 S.W ... 844, Ann.Cas. 1915C, 145." 6 Williams' Code, note ... ...
-
Camp v. Riddle
...recitals of this deed must be taken as prima facie true within the terms of the act of 1907, chapter 334, and the case of Hill v. Moore, 121 Tenn. 182, 113 S.W. 788, construing that statute. Section 1 of that act provides all instruments of conveyance executed in an official capacity by any......
-
Raines v. Pile
...been heretofore recognized and applied in the same way. Camp v. Riddle, 128 Tenn. 294, 160 S.W. 844 [Ann.Cas.1915C, 145]; Hill v. Moore, 121 Tenn. 182, 113 S.W. 788. "There being no other evidence, we must hold that the notice was In 33 C.J.S., Executions, § 229, pp. 486-487, it is said: "I......
-
York & Robinson v. Byars
... ... recognized and applied in the same way. Camp v ... Riddle, 128 Tenn. 294, 160 S.W. 844; Hill" v ... Moore, 121 Tenn. 182, 113 S.W. 788 ... There ... being no other evidence, we must hold that the notice was ... \xC2" ... ...