Hill v. Mut. Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

Decision Date04 June 1901
Citation39 S.E. 56,128 N.C. 463
PartiesHILL. v. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASS'N.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATIONS—VESTED RIGHTS—APPROVAL—RESOLUTION —PROXY—ESTOPPEL.

Where a member of a mutual benefit association sent his proxy to a meeting of the association held in another state, it will be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that such proxy was intended for the ordinary purposes of meetings; and hence a resolution passed thereat, depriving the member of vested rights under his insurance contract, will not be binding on him by reason of his proxy.

Montgomery, J., dissenting.

On rehearing. Dismissed.

For former opinion, see 36 S. E. 1023.

W. W. Clark, for plaintiff.

Hinsdale & Lawrence, Shepherd & Shepherd, and Sewell Tyng, for defendant.

DOUGLAS, J. For the reasons stated in Strauss v. Association (at this term) 39 S. E. 55, the defendant's petition to rehear is denied. In this case it appears that the plaintiff was present by proxy at the meeting of the defendant association at which the objectionable resolution was passed. We said in our former opinion in this case (126 N. C. 977, 36 S. E. 1023): "It is quite common for members of an association to send their proxies by request to the secretary or president, in order to permit a meeting to be held; but we cannot suppose that by any such formal act they intend to waive their vested rights, or to release the association from its contractual obligations." Judges cannot entirely devest themselves of the knowledge acquired as practicing attorneys, and those who have had experience in corporate management know that when a corporation is doing well, and no material changes are contemplated in its business, but few of the individual stockholders take any active part in its management, or even in the election of its officers. Frequently there would be no quorum, even, at its annual meetings, if it were not for the proxies of absent stockholders. This is especially true where there are a large proportion of nonresident stockholders. The secretary usually incloses a blank proxy in his notice of the meeting sent to each stockholder, which the stockholder, if he does not intend personally to attend the meeting, usually signs in blank, and returns to the secretary, or other officer, from whom he received it. In this way the officers of a corporation usually control its meetings. Even those stockholders that attend are generally willing to let well enough alone. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Fort v. Iowa Legion of Honor
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1909
    ... ... Honor, and to participate in the beneficiary fund of the ... order to the amount of two thousand ... association has no reserve fund except as provided for in the ... assessments per annum for the period of life expectancy ... of each assured person. That by ... by authority. Hobbs v. Assn., 82 Iowa 107, 47 N.W ... 983; Sieverts v ... Hill v. Mutual Reserve Fund & Co., 128 N.C. 463 (39 ... ...
  • Fort v. Iowa Legion of Honor
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1909
    ...no moment. Such representative had no right to bind the plaintiff or to agree to a change of his contract rights. Hill v. Mutual Reserve Fund & Co., 128 N. C. 463, 39 S. E. 56;Supreme Council v. Jordan, 117 Ga. 808, 45 S. E. 33;Supreme Council v. Getz, 112 Fed. 119, 50 C. C. A. 153. The tri......
  • Johnson v. Grand Fountain Of United Order Of True Reformers
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 11, 1904
    ...to put the burden upon him to show that there was no consent to the change. The opposite was held to be the law. Hill v. Life Ass'n, 128 N. C. 463, 39 S. E. 56; Strauss v. Life Ass'n, 128 N. C. 465, 39 S. E. 55, 54 L. R. A. 605, 83 Am. St. Rep. 699; Simmons v. Life Ass'n, 128 N. C. 469, 39 ......
  • Johnson v. Grand Fountain of United Order of True Reformers
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 11, 1904
    ... ... The opposite was held to be the ... law. Hill v. Life Ass'n, 128 N.C. 463, 39 S.E ... 56; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT