Hills v. Metzenroth

Decision Date19 May 1899
PartiesHILLS v. METZENROTH et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

This was a bill in equity to restrain defendant Metzenroth from making certain alterations in her premises in South Boston, and from permitting the same to be used for a Chinese laundry. The plaintiff and defendant both held under mesne conveyances from a corporation which, in 1867, inserted, in the deeds conveying the land which was then cut up into lots, a restriction that the land should be used only for dwelling houses and private stables, the main part of the dwelling houses to be not less than 21/2 stories in height.

COUNSEL

F.A. North, for plaintiff.

C.C. Long and Geo. A. Moore, for defendants.

OPINION

KNOWLTON, J.

The evidence stated in the 14 numbered paragraphs of the report well warranted the six findings of the judge. It being established by the findings that the original grantors of the lots into which the tract was divided inserted language, in all of the various deeds, intended to create restrictions upon the land for the benefit of all the grantees, as a part of a general scheme of improvement, the plaintiff can maintain his bill in equity to prevent a violation of the restrictions. Whitney v. Railway Co., 11 Gray, 359; Parker v. Nightingale, 6 Allen, 341; Jeffries v. Jeffries, 117 Mass. 184; Sanborn v. Rice, 129 Mass. 387; Payson v. Burnham, 141 Mass. 547, 6 N.E. 708; Hano v. Bigelow, 155 Mass. 341, 29 N.E. 628. Decree for the plaintiff.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Snow v. Van Dam
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 29, 1935
    ... ... scheme existing at the time of the earlier conveyances to the ... parties or their predecessors in title, in Hills v ... Metzenroth, 173 Mass. 423, 53 N.E. 890; Bacon v ... Sandberg, 179 Mass. 396, 60 N.E. 936; Stewart v ... Finkelstone, 206 Mass. 28, 92 ... ...
  • Codman v. Bradley
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1909
    ...similar facts it has been the practice of the courts to grant a mandatory injunction. Besides cases above cited, see Hills v. Metzenroth, 173 Mass. 423, 53 N.E. 890; Reardon v. Murphy, 163 Mass. 501, 40 N.E. Hamlen v. Werner, 144 Mass. 396, 11 N.E. 684; Bagnall v. Davies, 140 Mass. 76, 2 N.......
  • Duester v. Alvin
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • January 19, 1915
    ... ... To the ... same effect see Hamlen v. Werner, 144 Mass. 396, 11 ... N.E. 684; Hills v. Metzenroth, 173 Mass. 423, 53 ... N.E. 890; Evans v. Foss, 194 Mass. 513, 80 N.E. [74 ... Or. 555] 587, 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1039, 11 ... ...
  • Rogers v. Zwolak
    • United States
    • Court of Chancery of Delaware
    • April 29, 1920
    ... ... sufficiently manifested even in the absence of a plot ... Berry on Restrictions on the Use of Real Property, ... 347; Hills v. Metzenroth, 173 Mass. 423, 53 N.E ... 890; Leader v. La Flamme, 111 Me. 242, 88 A. 859 ... The restriction as to land within a particular ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT