Hillsley v. State Bank of Albany

Decision Date29 December 1966
Parties, 223 N.E.2d 571 Morton B. HILLSLEY, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STATE BANK OF ALBANY, Defendant-Appellant, and Glennon Builders, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents, and H. Irving Chase et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Trial Term, Albany County.

Plaintiff in conversion action sought to recover proceeds of certified check in amount of $10,000, payable jointly to plaintiff and defendant Glennon and paid to defendant Glennon by bank, which was predecessor of defendant state bank. There was evidence that attorney for persons named Mooney had made and delivered check to defendant Birmingham, president of defendant Glennon, as a progress payment on a house which plaintiff was building pursuant to a contract with defendant Glennon, and which was to be conveyed by defendant Glennon to the Mooneys, and that check bore notation 'Re: Mooney' on its face, and that defendant Birmingham indorsed the check with plaintiff's name and deposited it in defendant Glennon's account with defendant national bank, and that at defendant Birmingham's request defendant national bank simultaneously issued two cashier's checks, totaling $10,000, which defendant Birmingham delivered to plaintiff for application to another house, which plaintiff and building under contract with defendant Glennon, and that proceeds thereof were applied to the other house, which was subsequently completed and conveyed by defendant Glennon to others, and that plaintiff thereafter learned of the forged indorsement on the certified check.

The defendant state bank asserted as a defense that plaintiff had received the proceeds of the $10,000 certified check and had suffered no damage by reason of the forged indorsement.

The Supreme Court, Albany County, Trial Term, Russell G. Hunt, J., entered a judgment for the plaintiff for $10,000 with costs and disbursements.

The Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, 24 A.D.2d 28, 263 N.Y.S.2d 578, on an appeal transferred by the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, modified, on the law and the facts, and, as modified, affirmed amended judgment of the Trial Term. The modification consisted of directing that plaintiff should have interest added to his recovery, that plaintiff should, in addition, have judgment therefor as against defendants Glennon and Birmingham, and that the cause should be remanded to the Trial Term for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Lund's Inc. v. Chemical Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • March 16, 1989
    ... ... federal district court deciding a diversity case applies the same choice of law rules as the state courts in the state in which it sits. Klaxon v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61 S.Ct ... Stapleton in turn cites two New York cases: Hillsley v. State Bank of Albany, 24 A.D.2d 28, 263 N.Y.S.2d 578 (1st Dep't 1965), aff'd, 18 N.Y.2d 952, 223 ... ...
  • Spector v. Mermelstein
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 11, 1973
    ... ... , a sum in excess of $400,000, was applied to Spector's personal bank account, it was hardly sufficient to offset the large sums which he had by ... 8 See Collier v. Granger, 258 F.Supp. 717 (S.D.N.Y. 1966); Hillsley v. State Bank of Albany, 24 A.D.2d 28, 263 N.Y.S.2d 578 (1965), affd ... ...
  • Thigpen v. Allstate Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi
    • January 8, 1991
    ... ... to Audie Edmonson, Susan Thigpen, Gary Thigpen and Magnolia Federal Bank for Savings, as loss payee, in the amount of $92,332.85, representing ... under the Uniform Commercial Code, the court predicts that the state court would not view the issue any differently under the Code. Although ... had interest in converted checks worth less than the face value); Hillsley v. State Bank of Albany, 24 A.D.2d 28, 263 N.Y.S.2d 578 (N.Y ... ...
  • Mouradian v. Astoria Federal Sav. and Loan
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 1997
    ... ...         We are asked on this appeal to decide whether a drawee bank, sued for conversion under UCC 3-419, is entitled to show that the payee ... as it imposes an absolute liability on the drawee (compare, Hillsley v. State Bank, 24 A.D.2d 28, 30, 263 N.Y.S.2d 578, aff'd 18 N.Y.2d 952, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT