Hilton v. State
Decision Date | 26 August 2021 |
Docket Number | No. SC19-373, No. SC19-1766,SC19-373 |
Citation | 326 So.3d 640 |
Parties | Gary Michael HILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Gary Michael Hilton, Petitioner, v. Mark S. Inch, etc., Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Robert A. Morris of The Law Offices of Robert A. Morris, LLC, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael T. Kennett, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee/Respondent
Gary Michael Hilton appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion to vacate his conviction of first-degree murder and sentence of death filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm the order of the postconviction court and deny the habeas petition.
Hilton was convicted of the December 2007 kidnapping and murder of Cheryl Dunlap and sentenced to death. Hilton v. State , 117 So. 3d 742, 746 (Fla. 2013). On direct appeal, this Court summarized the relevant facts as follows:
Several witnesses testified to seeing or encountering Hilton during the time of Dunlap's disappearance. One saw Hilton rummaging through a white Toyota Camry on the side of the road. Another spoke to him in a convenience store while Hilton was wearing a blue and white patterned shirt matching the shirt seen on the ATM surveillance video. When Hilton was later arrested in Georgia for a different murder, he pointed Georgia officials to a bayonet he had left on a hiking trail in Georgia. An FDLE tool mark expert matched the bayonet to the puncture marks in Dunlap's tire.
On June 6, 2008, several officers transported Hilton from Georgia, where he had been in custody for a prior murder, to Florida. Id. at 748. Hilton spoke for nearly the entire drive, but was not questioned. Id. At trial, the State played portions of Hilton's recorded statements made during the drive. Id. Hilton stated:
I'm not all bad. I mean, you got to understand, I mean, I'm sure you can see. I mean, I'm a [expletive] genius, man. I'm not a—I'm not all bad. I just, you know, lost my mind for a little bit. Lost a grip on myself, man. What can I tell you? FBI and everybody else is trying to scratch their head, hey, guys don't get started doing my shit at 61 years old. It just don't happen, you know. Like there's a retired FBI (indecipherable) named Cliff Van, Clifford Van Zandt, that keeps getting himself in the news, talking about me. And he said, this guy didn't just fall off the turnip truck, he said. You know, in other words, he's been doing this. But like I told you before, you know, when I saw you before, I said, remember, I said I'd give you one for free. Nothing before September, okay? I mean, I'm not joking, okay? I just, I got old and sick and couldn't make a living and just lost, flat lost my [expletive] mind for a while, man. I couldn't get a grip on it.
Id. Additionally, Hilton made incriminating statements to a fellow inmate that were overheard by a correctional officer (Officer Wynn). Id. at 748-49. During the penalty phase, the state presented testimony regarding Hilton's prior murder in Georgia to which he pleaded guilty. Id. at 749.
On February 21, 2011, the jury unanimously recommended that Hilton be sentenced to death and the trial court found six aggravating factors beyond a reasonable doubt, one statutory mitigating factor, and eight nonstatutory mitigating factors. Id. at 746. Assigning the noted weight to each aggravator, the trial court found (1) the defendant was previously convicted of a violent felony (great weight); (2) the murder was committed in the course of a kidnapping (great weight); (3) the murder was committed to avoid arrest (moderate weight); (4) the murder was committed for pecuniary gain (some weight); (5) the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC) (great weight); and (6) the murder was cold, calculated, and premeditated (CCP) (great weight). Id. at 749.
The court also considered and weighed each mitigating circumstance proposed by Hilton and found one statutory mental mitigating factor—at the time of the murder Hilton was under extreme emotional distress (some weight). Id. Under the catch-all provision, the trial court considered ten mitigating factors, finding that Hilton established eight of them and rejecting two. Id. The court found (1) Hilton grew up in an abusive household (some weight); (2) Hilton abused drugs, specifically Ritalin (some weight); (3) Hilton was deprived of a relationship with his biological father (moderate weight); (4) Hilton is already serving a life sentence so society is protected (some weight); (5) Hilton served his country in the U.S. military (very little weight); (6) Hilton suffered maternal deprivation and lack of bonding between mother and child (some weight); (7) Hilton was removed from his home and put into foster care when he was a child (some weight); (8) Hilton grew up in a financially poor family (not proven); (9) Hilton suffered a traumatic brain injury as a child (some weight); and (10) Hilton suffers from severe mental defects (not proven). Id . at 749-50. The court found beyond a reasonable doubt that the aggravators outweighed the mitigators. Id. at 750.
We affirmed Hilton's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Id. at 750-66.1 Hilton timely filed his initial rule 3.851 motion for postconviction relief on November 26, 2014. On April 20, 2017, Hilton filed his Second Motion for Leave to Amend Initial Postconviction Motion and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, raising seven claims. On June 14, 2017, claim 6 was dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend due to legal insufficiency. Hilton filed an Amended Claim 6 on July 21, 2017. An evidentiary hearing was conducted, after which the trial court entered an order denying Hilton's motion for postconviction relief on February 12, 2019.
This appeal follows. Hilton has also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
The majority of the claims presented in Hilton's appeal allege ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To demonstrate entitlement to relief on such a claim, a defendant must meet the following requirements:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson v. State
...assistance of trial counsel: the petitioner must demonstrate deficient performance and resulting prejudice." Hilton v. State , 326 So. 3d 640, 652 (Fla. 2021) (citing Frances v. State , 143 So. 3d 340, 358 (Fla. 2014) ). Therefore, the petitioner mustestablish [first, that] the alleged omis......