Hinson v. Brown
| Decision Date | 28 August 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 394P86,394P86 |
| Citation | 348 S.E.2d 138,318 N.C. 282 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Joan S. HINSON v. Doyle BROWN and Coleen B. Brown. |
White & Crumpler, Winston-Salem, for defendants.
Joseph W. Freeman, Jr., Elkin, for plaintiff.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th day of August 1986."
Therefore, it is considered and adjudged further that Defendants do pay the sum of Nine and no/100 Dollars ($9.00) and that execution issue therefor.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 337PA88
...and appealed. The Court of Appeals found no error. Hinson v. Brown, 80 N.C.App. 661, 343 S.E.2d 284 (1986), disc. rev. denied, 318 N.C. 282, 348 S.E.2d 138 (1986). The Browns, thereafter, filed this action, alleging that Lumbermens breached its insurance contract by failing properly to defe......
-
Alston v. Monk
...of Allen's testimony was error. Hinson v. Brown, 80 N.C.App. 661, 343 S.E.2d 284, disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 318 N.C. 282, 348 S.E.2d 138 (1986). This assignment of error is By defendants' fourth assignment of error they argue that the trial court erred by allowing the testimon......
-
Giles v. Smith
...a legal defense which operates to bar an action. Id. But cf. Hinson v. Brown, 80 N.C.App. 661, 343 S.E.2d 284, rev. denied, 318 N.C. 282, 348 S.E.2d 138 (1986) (holding that sudden emergency is an affirmative defense which must be specifically plead). External forces that have been found to......
- Craig by Craig v. Buncombe County Bd. of Educ., 392P86