Hirschl v. Clark
Citation | 47 N.W. 78,81 Iowa 200 |
Parties | HIRSCHL ET AL. v. CLARK. |
Decision Date | 20 October 1890 |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Scott county; ANDREW HOWATT, Judge.
This is an equitable proceeding, the object of which is to determine the rights of the parties to the proceeds of a benefit certificate, issued by the Iowa Knights of Pythias Insurance Association upon the life of William Burrows, deceased. The plaintiff claims the said proceeds as trustee for the mother and other relatives of the deceased, and the defendant Mary Burrows claims that she is the lawful beneficiary of the fund, and that it should be paid to her. The insurance association made no contest as to the validity of the certificate, and, by agreement of all parties, the money due from the association was paid to A. J. Hirschl, Esq., and by proper pleadings Clark, the trustee, and said Mary Burrows presented their respective claims to said proceeds. The district court held that Mary Burrows was the lawful beneficiary, and ordered the proceeds to be paid to her. J. H. Clark, trustee, appeals.C. W. Haller and G. H. Koch, for appellant.
Bills & Hass, for appellees.
1. The insurance was effected in October, 1882. The contract of insurance was made upon an application, of which the following is a copy: The benefit certificate issued by the association was in these words:
William Burrows died at the city of Davenport, in this state, on the 26th day of April, 1888. On the 21st day of said month, he executed an instrument in writing, in these words: There is no controversy about the execution of this paper, and, although it appears that Burrows was quite feeble at the time he signed the same, there is no evidence that it was not his voluntary act, or that those who were present and prepared the paper, and witnessed the signature, used any influence or persuasion to induce him to sign it. They were present at his request for the purpose of aiding him in carrying out his desire to change the beneficiary in the certificate. One of said persons testified as a witness as follows: Another testified as follows: “I was summoned to the sick-bed of Wm. Burrows, and he urged me to assist in making this change; that he had long intended to make the change, but his wife had prevented him from doing it, and he wanted me to help him with it, which I promised I would do, and when the paper was brought, there were some minor changes to be made.” It further appears in evidence that the said paper was placed in the mail at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Ginther
...until after the death of the insured does not affect the validity of the designation; Estes v. Local Union, (Mass.) 97 A. 326; Hirschl v. Clark, (Ia.) 47 N.W. 78; validity of the certificate, death of first beneficiary, maturity of the obligation, right of insured to designate his brother a......
-
Allison v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
... ... & G. C. v. Terrell, 99 F. 330; ... Berkeley v. Harper, 3 App. D. C. 308; Nally v ... Nally, 74 Ga. 669, 58 Am. Rep. 458; Hirschl v ... Clark, 81 Iowa 200, 47 N.W. 78, 9 L. R. A. 841; ... Schmidt v. Iowa K. of P. Ins. Assn., 82 Iowa 304, 47 ... N.W. 1032, 11 L. R. A. 205; ... ...
-
Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World v. Wood
... ... Head Camp, 27 Wash. 218; Hoeft v. Lodge, 113 ... Cal. 91; Schoneu v. Lodge, 85 Minn. 349; Brown ... v. Lodge, 80 Iowa 287; Hirschel v. Clark, 81 ... Iowa 200; Union v. Hunter, 99 Ill.App. 146; ... Knights v. Franke, 137 Ill. 118; Doherty v. A ... O. H. Fund, 176 Mass. 285; Byrne v ... ...
-
Holden v. Modern Brotherhood of Am.
...v. A. O. U. W., 110 Iowa, 642, 82 N. W. 331;Simcoke v. A. O. U. W., 84 Iowa, 383, 51 N. W. 8, 15 L. R. A. 114;Hirschl v. Clark, 81 Iowa, 200, 47 N. W. 78, 9 L. R. A. 841;Brown v. A. O. U. W., 80 Iowa, 287, 45 N. W. 884, 20 Am. St. Rep. 420. As already observed, the original defendant, the b......