Hitt v. Bell
| Decision Date | 31 December 1937 |
| Docket Number | No. 8582.,8582. |
| Citation | 111 S.W.2d 1164 |
| Parties | HITT v. BELL et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Fowler Roberts, of Big Lake, for plaintiff in error.
McGillivray Muse, of Brownwood, for defendants in error.
The parties will be designated appellant and appellee.
Appellee Hall sued appellant, D. S. Hitt, Jr., for a balance due on his promissory note and recovered judgment by default for $1,015.85. A citation issued for appellant directed to "The Sheriff or any Constable, Howard County, Texas." It was served and return made thereon by "Luke Crump, Constable, Precinct No. 2, Reagan County, Texas." No other service was had on appellant, nor did he waive service or appear in the case. The judgment recited that he had been duly cited but failed to appear. From such default judgment this writ of error is prosecuted.
In the early case of Witt v. Kaufman, 25 Tex.Supp. 384, 386, the service by the sheriff of one county of a citation directed to the sheriff of another county, was declared to be no service; and that the judgment based thereon "was consequently void." An unbroken line of cases follow this decision, and hold that a default judgment, rendered without appearance by the defendant, or without service of citation, or waiver of service, or on insufficient service, is void and may be set aside in a direct attack by appeal or writ of error. And where it appears on the face of the record, as in the instant case, that the citation or service thereof is void, the default judgment may be set aside on appeal or writ of error without the necessity of showing a valid defense, even though the term at which the judgment was rendered had adjourned, and notwithstanding the judgment recited that the defendant had been duly cited and failed to appear. Glass v. Smith, 66 Tex. 548, 550, 2 S.W. 195, 196; Levy v. Roper, 113 Tex. 356, 256 S.W. 251; Flynt v. City of Kingsville, 125 Tex. 510, 82 S.W.2d 934; Brown v. Clippinger, 113 Tex. 364, 256 S.W. 254; Douthit v. Martin, 15 Tex.Civ.App. 559, 39 S.W. 944; City of Corpus Christi v. Scruggs, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 458; Turner v. Ephraim, Tex. Civ.App., 28 S.W.2d 608; 25 Tex.Jur....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lamesa Rural High School Dist. v. Speck, 2963
...When a judgment does not recite due service of process, the entire record may be examined to ascertain such fact. Hitt v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1164; Ringgold v. Graham, Tex.Com.App., 13 S.W.2d An examination of the record discloses that the Justice Court citation upon which the de......
-
City State Bank in Wellington v. Bailey
...256 S.W. 251; Tyler v. Blanton, 34 Tex.Civ.App. 393, 78 S.W. 564; Friend v. Thomas et al., Tex.Civ.App., 187 S.W. 986; Hitt v. Bell et al., Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1164; Witt v. Kaufman & Kleaver, 25 Tex.Supp. 384; Flynt v. City of Kingsville, 125 Tex. 510, 82 S.W.2d 934; State Mortgage Co......
-
Carborundum Co. v. Keese
...253 S.W.2d 315 (writ refused N.R.E.); Firman Leather Goods Corporation v. McDonald & Shaw, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 137; Hitt v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1164 and Lemothe v. Cimbalista, by Gates, Tex.Civ.App., 236 S.W.2d 681. The citation here was directed to Jim Allison. We sustain a......
-
Smith v. Commercial Credit Corporation
...is entitled to have the same set aside without the necessity of showing a meritorious defense. To the same effect, see Hitt v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 1164 and T. J., Sec. 158, p. 553. Courts universally hold that in order to give validity to the judgment and proceedings had under se......