Hobbs v. Iowa Mutual Benefit Association
Decision Date | 03 February 1891 |
Citation | 47 N.W. 983,82 Iowa 107 |
Parties | EVA HOBBS, Appellee, v. IOWA MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, Appellant |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Des Moines District Court.--HON. CHARLES H. PHELPS Judge.
ACTION on a certificate of membership issued by defendant to Richard Hobbs for the benefit of the plaintiff. A jury was impaneled to try the cause, and after the evidence was submitted, by direction of the court, it returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of one thousand and nineteen dollars and sixty-seven cents. A motion for a new trial filed by the defendant was overruled, and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the verdict and costs. The defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
A. H Stutsman and Dodge & Dodge, for appellant.
Powers & Huston, for appellee.
The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. On June 22, 1886, it issued to Richard Hobbs, on his application, a certificate of membership, of which the following is a copy:
Richard Hobbs died on July 14, 1889, and proof of his death was duly furnished on the twenty-second day of that month.
I. The defendant denies liability on the certificate in suit, on the alleged ground that the death of Hobbs resulted from his engaging in an employment in violation of the contract of insurance. That contract, in terms, includes the articles of incorporation of defendant, and the application for membership of Hobbs. The portions of that application material to an examination of the questions presented are as follows:
Among the articles or incorporation in force when the certificate was issued was the following: One of the by-laws of the defendant, also in force at that time, is as follows:
At the time the certificate was issued. Hobbs was a car-sealer, and that fact was known to the defendant; but, at the time of his death, he was a car-coupler, and had been so engaged for about three months. While performing his duty as a car-coupler. he received an injury which caused his death within a few hours. The appellee contends that Hobbs, in following the occupation of a car-coupler, did not violate his contract of insurance. That portion of the articles of incorporation of defendant which we have set out provides that a person otherwise qualified, "who is not employed in any extra hazardous business," may be admitted as a member of the association.
It is not claimed that the occupation of car-sealer is extra hazardous. It follows, therefore, that Hobbs was qualified as to his occupation, to become a member of the association, when the contract of insurance was entered into, and that he became a member of the association under a valid agreement. The question is, did he cease to be such member by reason of his change of employment? By-law number 12 defines the occupation of "car-couplers" as extra hazardous. If it be conceded that the by-law named became a part of the contract of insurance, we have the case of one who, being a member of the association, adopted an occupation which would have disqualified him as an original applicant for membership. The contract of insurance contains nothing in regard to a change of occupation by a member. By-law number 12 allows members to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hobbs v. Iowa Mut. Ben. Ass'n
... ... , Judge.Action on a certificate of membership issued by defendant to Richard Hobbs for the benefit of plaintiff. A jury was impaneled to try the cause, and after the evidence was submitted, by ... of membership witnesseth: That Richard Hobbs is a member of division A of the Iowa Mutual Benefit Association, and in consideration thereof, and the future payment of all annual dues and ... ...